Indexed in Journament

chemical senses

ISSN 0379-864X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,508 of 19,457 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 30.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name chemical senses
ISSN 0379-864X

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.1
Timeliness 80.0
Community Impact 0.7
Content Distribution 38.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.1 29.9
Accessibility — 19.8
Timeliness 80.0 40.7
Diversity — 30.0
Innovation — 37.6
Community Impact 0.7 27.6
Content Distribution 38.1 84.9
Content Quality — 54.2
Ethics & Transparency — 39.5
Editorial Standards — 32.5
Publication Regularity — 51.6
Geographic Reach — 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2009
The Molecular Receptive Ranges of Human TAS2R Bitter Taste Receptors
Wolfgang Meyerhof, Claudia Batram, Christina Kühn, Anne Brockhoff, Elke Chudoba, Bernd Bufe, Giovanni Appendino, Maik Behrens
29 views DOI Abstract
2014
Olfactory Disorders and Quality of Life--An Updated Review
Ilona Croy, Steven Nordin, Thomas Hummel
16 views DOI Abstract
1997
‘Sniffin’ Sticks': Olfactory Performance Assessed by the Combined Testing of Odour Identification, Odor Discrimination and Olfactory Threshold
Thomas Hummel, B. Sekinger, S. R. Wolf, E. Pauli, Gerd Kobal
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Vomeronasal sensory input and its social behavioral output
Hiro Kondo, Tetsuo Iwata, Junji Hirota
9 views DOI Abstract
1996
Evaluating the ‘Labeled Magnitude Scale’ for Measuring Sensations of Taste and Smell
Barry G. Green, Pamela Dalton, Beverly J. Cowart, Greg Shaffer, Krystyna Rankin, Jennifer Higgins
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
From Receptors to Behavior: Molecular and Functional Logic of Sensory Coding in the Mouse Accessory Olfactory System
Sachiko Haga‐Yamanaka, Andrea Rocha
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Reference data for Bayesian adaptive QUEST-based taste recognitions thresholds from pooled individual participant data
Richard Höchenberger, Thomas Hummel, Kathrin Ohla
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Trigeminal Function Questionnaire (TriFunQ): A Tool for Clinical and Research Use
Wiktoria Jędryczka, Susanne Weise, Anabell Bormann, Thomas Hummel
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Expression of <i>Calca</i> gene-derived peptides in the murine taste system
Salin Raj Palayyan, Abdul Hamid Siddiqui, Peihua Jiang, Robert F. Margolskee, Sunil K. Sukumaran
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
State-dependent neuronal activities of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the rat insular cortex during a cue-guided lever manipulation task involving saccharin reward
Risako Kato-Miyabe, Mie Kajiwara, Satomi Kobayashi, Masayuki Kobayashi
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Pre-treatment with creatinine alters the perceived bitterness–sweetness balance of L-histidine in young Japanese female participants
Takashi Kondoh
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Bowman’s glands act as facultative stem cells following olfactory epithelial lesion
Tiffany Ko, Vincent M D’Anniballe, John B. Finlay, Michael Wang, Isabela M Aguilar, Sarah Kim, Ayad Ali, Lauren Orr, David A. Lee, Naveen Vridhachalam, Bradley J. Goldstein
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Odor Sampling Bags Enable Reliable Delivery of Controlled Odor Concentrations
Matthew Andres, Robert Pellegrino, Xuebo Song, Fernanda Ocampos, Joel D. Mainland
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Dissociation between amiloride-sensitive taste responses and ingestive behavior to sodium ascorbate in osteogenic disorder Shionogi rats
Toshiaki Yasuo, Shinpei Takahashi, Shusuke Iwata, Noritaka Sako
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Attentional Modulation of Contamination Sensitivity: Sharper Perceptual Boundaries for Food compared to Non-Food Odour Mixtures
Leonie Seidel, Astrid E. Iversen, Konstantina Kilteni, Janina Seubert
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Hierarchies of Smell: Structuring the molecular odor space using Semantic Taxonomies and machine learning
A Sajan, Stijn Sluis, Reza Haydarlou, Sanne Abeln, Pasquale Lisena, Raphaël Troncy, Caro Verbeek, Inger Leemans, Halima Mouhib
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
State-dependent neuronal activities of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the rat insular cortex during a cue-guided lever manipulation task involving saccharin reward
Risako Kato-Miyabe, Mie Kajiwara, Satomi Kobayashi, Masayuki Kobayashi
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
A method for assessing approach and avoidance behavior across multiple olfactory stimuli in mice including multivariate hypothesis comparisons
Michelle C Rosenthal, Alper Kagan Bakir, Ankur Gaikwad, Katharina Clark, Adam T. Garcia, John P. McGann
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
From Receptors to Behavior: Molecular and Functional Logic of Sensory Coding in the Mouse Accessory Olfactory System
Sachiko Haga‐Yamanaka, Andrea Rocha
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Vomeronasal sensory input and its social behavioral output
Hiro Kondo, Tetsuo Iwata, Junji Hirota
9 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,508 of 19,457 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

38.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.