journal of the chemical society, faraday transactions 1: physical chemistry in condensed phases | Journament

Journal Ranking

#924 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of the chemical society, faraday transactions 1: physical chemistry in condensed phases

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of the chemical society, faraday transactions 1: physical chemistry in condensed phases
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/f1
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (34 total)

1987
Incorporation and stability of iron in molecular-sieve structures. Ferrisilicate analogues of zeolite ZSM-5
Szostak R.
Vol. 83 , pp. 487-494
273 views DOI
2017
spectral—fragile—(un)homely: the haunting presence of francesca woodman in the house and space2 series
;Anna Kisiel
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 145-156
248 views DOI Abstract
2017
haunting across the class divide: sarah waters’s affinity and the little stranger
;Barbara Klonowska
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 171-178
244 views DOI Abstract
2016
atlas poznawczy: w stronę fundamentów wiedzy w neurokognitywistyce
;Russell A. Poldrack;Aniket Kittur;Donald Kalar;Eric MillerI;Christian Seppa;Yolanda Gil;Stott D. Parker;Fred W. Sabb;Robert M. Bilder;Przemysław Nowakowski
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 75-100
239 views DOI Abstract
1986
Crystallisation of silicalite-1 precursors in the amine–(C3H7)4NBr–SiO2–H2O system
Stuart G. Fegan,Barrie M. Lowe;Stuart G. Fegan;Barrie M. Lowe;
Vol. 82 , No. 3 , pp. 801-813
225 views DOI Abstract
2013
good old-fashioned ethnography of laboratory
;Łukasz Afeltowicz
Vol. 4 , No. 1/2013 , pp. 383-394
223 views DOI Abstract
2013
language and media as extensions of the mind
;Robert K. Logan;Marcin Trybulec
Vol. IV , No. 2/2013 , pp. 31-44
218 views Abstract
2016
diversity of rule-based approaches: classic systems and recent applications
;Grzegorz J. Nalepa
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 104-116
213 views DOI Abstract
2011
mytho-poetical thought as described by ernst cassirer and lucian blaga: a comparative approach applied to works of poetry
;Emilia Ivancu
Vol. 2 , No. T/2011 , pp. 207-234
205 views Abstract
2017
spectres of ambiguity in divergent thinking and perceptual switching
;Mihaela Taranu;Frank Loesche
Vol. 8 , No. S , pp. 121-133
197 views DOI Abstract
View All 34 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.