Indexed in Journament

philosophical transactions series a, mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences

ISSN 1471-2962· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,836 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
69 Articles
Scores higher than 83.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name philos trans a math phys eng sci
Abbreviated Name philos trans a math phys eng sci
ISSN 1471-2962

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 45.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 57.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for philosophical transactions series a, mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 45.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.0 5.8
Content Distribution 57.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (69)

2010
Molecular mechanisms of crystallization impacting calcium phosphate cements
Vol. 368 , No. 1917 , pp. -
651 views Abstract
2010
Next-generation biomedical implants using additive manufacturing of complex, cellular and functional mesh arrays.
Vol. 368 , No. 1917 , pp. 1999-2032
462 views DOI Abstract
2008
open cultural spaces in search of new frontiers
, No. 82-83 , pp. 57-65
404 views Abstract
2020
Optimum resource allocation in optical wireless systems with energy-efficient fog and cloud architectures.
Vol. 378 , No. 2169 , pp. 20190188
373 views DOI Abstract
2014
Flexibility mechanisms in ideal zeolite frameworks.
Vol. 372 , No. 2008 , pp. 20120036
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Documentation, structural health monitoring and numerical modelling for damage assessment of the Morris Island Lighthouse.
Vol. 377 , No. 2155 , pp. 20190002
359 views DOI Abstract
2014
new trends in bolivian migratory fields in the face of the crisis
, No. 106/107 , pp. 61-84
352 views Abstract
2016
Statistical microeconomics and commodity prices: theory and empirical results.
Vol. 374 , No. 2058
340 views DOI Abstract
2008
On the acceleration of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays.
Vol. 366 , No. 1884 , pp. 4417-28
334 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimum resource allocation in optical wireless systems with energy-efficient fog and cloud architectures.
Vol. 378 , No. 2169 , pp. 20190188
373 views DOI Abstract
2020
The physics of numerical analysis: a climate modelling case study
Vol. 378 , pp. 20190058
290 views DOI
2020
Energy-driven computing.
Vol. 378 , No. 2164 , pp. 20190158
224 views DOI Abstract
2020
Internal resonances and relaxation memory kernels in composites.
Vol. 378 , No. 2162 , pp. 20190106
223 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thermal dependence of large-scale freckle defect formation.
Vol. 377 , No. 2143 , pp. 20180206
191 views DOI Abstract
2019
Contextuality, memory cost and non-classicality for sequential measurements.
Vol. 377 , No. 2157 , pp. 20190141
254 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quantum contextuality in the Copenhagen approach.
Vol. 377 , No. 2157 , pp. 20190025
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Acting together, destabilizing influences can stabilize human balance.
Vol. 377 , No. 2153 , pp. 20180126
160 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,836 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

45.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

57.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.