Indexed in Journament

the journal of physical chemistry a

ISSN 1520-5215· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,845 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 28.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j phys chem a
Abbreviated Name j phys chem a
ISSN 1520-5215
URL http://pubs.acs.org/journal/jpcafh

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the journal of physical chemistry a
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.7 13.4
Content Distribution 76.5 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2019
Infrared-Spectroscopic Study of (4-Methylpent-3-en-1-ynyl)methylthiocarbene, Its Photochemical Transformations, and Reactions in an Argon Matrix.
Vol. 123 , No. 42 , pp. 9175-9184
447 views DOI Abstract
2017
Quantum Chemical Study of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Effects on Combustion Kinetics.
Vol. 121 , No. 19 , pp. 3728-3735
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
Oxidation Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Resonance-Stabilized Radicals: The Pent-1-en-3-yl + O Reaction.
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Aminofluoresceins vs Fluorescein: Ascertained New Unusual Features of Tautomerism and Dissociation of Hydroxyxanthene Dyes in Solution.
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Blue Phosphorescent trans-N-Heterocyclic Carbene Platinum Acetylides. Dependence on Energy Gap and Conformation.
401 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nonmonotonous Lattice Distortion Model for Gas Hydrates.
Vol. 124 , No. 16 , pp. 3149-3156
279 views DOI Abstract
2020
Vibrational Spectra of the Ruthenium-Tris-Bipyridine Dication and Its Reduced Form in Vacuo.
Vol. 124 , No. 12 , pp. 2449-2459
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
Gas-Phase Complexes of Americium and Lanthanides with a Bis-Triazinyl Pyridine: Reactivity and Bonding of Archetypes for F-Element Separations.
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quantifying the Competition between Intersystem Crossing and Spin-Conserved Pathways in the Thermal Reaction of V + NO.
Vol. 124 , No. 1 , pp. 30-38
247 views DOI Abstract
2019
Substituent Effect on the Himbert Intramolecular Arene/Allene Diels-Alder Reaction: NBO Analysis and State Specific Dual Descriptors.
Vol. 123 , No. 50 , pp. 10730-10738
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Plasmon-Induced Dimerization of Thiazolidine-2,4-dione on Silver Nanoparticles: Revealed by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Study.
Vol. 123 , No. 45 , pp. 9770-9780
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
Photodissociation Dynamics and Stereodynamics of Methyl Mercaptan and Dimethyl Sulfide from the Second Absorption Band at 201 and 210 nm.
Vol. 123 , No. 40 , pp. 8552-8561
286 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,845 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.