discussions of the faraday society | Journament

Journal Ranking

#328 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

discussions of the faraday society

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name discussions of the faraday society
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/df
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2017
Талассоаттрактивность населения в современной России: общественно-географическая экспликация=the coastalisation of population in today’s russia: a sociogeographical explication
;Дружинин А. Г.
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 28-43
351 views DOI Abstract
1949
Separations using zeolitic materials
Barrer R.
Vol. 7 , pp. 135-141
297 views DOI
2014
neraskrytyj potencial sotrudnichestva rossii i evropejskogo sojuza v oblasti jenergojeffektivnosti i vozmozhnosti baltijskogo regiona
;Romanova T. A.
Vol. 1 , pp. 29-45
273 views DOI Abstract
2012
ob istoricheskom kontekste innovacionnogo razvitija rossii [on the historical context of innovative development in russia]
;Krivosheev Vladimir
Vol. 4 , pp. 49-58
252 views DOI Abstract
2011
evropejskaja ideja v central'noj evrope i skandinavii kak chast' politiki bezopasnosti i mirnogo sosushhestvovanija v ramkah poslevoennogo planirovanija [the european idea in central europe and scandinavia as a part of the security and peaceful co-existence policy in the framework of the postwar planning]
;Chernyshev Yevgeny
Vol. 4 , pp. 123-133
239 views DOI Abstract
2014
centry i periferija v stranah baltii i regionah severo-zapada rossii: dinamika naselenija v 2000-e gody
;Mkrtchyan N.;Karachurina L.
Vol. 2 , pp. 62-80
229 views DOI Abstract
2011
osveshhenie sovremennyh rossijskih innovacij v smi danii [the image of modern russian innovations in the danish mass media]
;Ryabichenko Arkady
Vol. 4 , pp. 97-105
209 views DOI Abstract
2013
regional'nyj podhod v politike rossijskoj federacii v otnoshenii jestonskoj respubliki [the regional approach in the policy of the russian federation to-wards the republic of estonia]
;Lanko Dmitry
Vol. 3 , pp. 52-64
187 views DOI Abstract
2011
kaliningradskaja oblast' v pol'skih nauchnyh issledovanijah [the kaliningrad region in polish scientific research]
;Żukowski Arkadiusz;Kotowicz Wojciech
Vol. 2 , pp. 127-138
179 views DOI Abstract
2015
jeffektivnye trudovye resursy kak faktor razvitija kaliningradskoj jekonomiki
;Fedorov G.
Vol. 1 , pp. 101-116
164 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.