quarterly reviews, chemical society | Journament

Journal Ranking

#55 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
45.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

quarterly reviews, chemical society

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name quarterly reviews, chemical society
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/qr
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2016
bioaccumulation of cadmium and lead in rodent species from the region of lead-zinc smelting factory – plovdiv (south bulgaria)
;Hristo A. Dimitrov;Vesela I. Mitkovska;Valeri D. Tzekov;Tsenka G. Chassovnikarova
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 9-18
250 views Abstract
2015
the allelopathic effect of the exotic tree acacia saligna on the germination of wheat and canola
;Mohamed Kamel;Sabah A. Hammad
Vol. 7 , pp. 103-112
242 views Abstract
2014
species diversity and distribution of amphibians and reptiles in nature park "sinite kamani" in stara planina mt. (bulgaria)
;Stanimira R. Deleva;Ivelin A. Mollov;Valentina M. Fidanova;Alexander K. Mechev
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 83-92
230 views Abstract
2009
risks and opportunities of urbanization – structure of two populations of the balkan wall lizard podarcis tauricus (pallas, 1814) in the city of plovdiv
;Ivelin A. Mollov;Miglena V. Valkanova
Vol. 1 , pp. 27-39
226 views Abstract
2015
preliminary data of the shell morphometry of populations of zebrina detrita (mollusca: gastropoda: pulmonata) from bulgaria
;Antonia Z. Gospodinova;Dilian G. Georgiev;Ivelin A. Mollov
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 79-83
224 views Abstract
2010
studies on terrestrial herbaceous plants tolerance to excess heavy metals: methodological approach
;Andon Vassilev;Anna Nikolova
Vol. 2 , pp. 65-74
212 views Abstract
2013
macrofungal communities in hyrcanian forests, north of iran: relationships with season and forest types
;Maryam Karim;Mohammad Reza Kavosi;Goodarz Hajizadeh
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 87-96
206 views Abstract
2013
diet of threatened pheasant species in himalayas, india – a faecal analysis approach
;Mohammad Shah Hussain;Aisha Sultana
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 57-68
204 views Abstract
2010
the effects of gap disturbance on soil chemical and biochemical properties in a mixed beech – hornbeam forest of iran
;Y. Kooch;S. M. Hosseini;J. Mohammadi;S. M. Hojjati
Vol. 2 , pp. 39-56
200 views Abstract
2015
the influence of cadmium on the food consumption and utilization of the cotton leaf worm spodoptera littoralis (boisd.) (lepidoptera: noctuidae)
;Shahenda A. Abu ElEla;Wael M. ElSayed
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 81-85
194 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
45
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

45.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.