russian journal of coordination chemistry/koordinatsionnaya khimiya | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2681 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

russian journal of coordination chemistry/koordinatsionnaya khimiya

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name russian journal of coordination chemistry/koordinatsionnaya khimiya
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/11173
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2018
Electrochemical Synthesis, Properties, and Structure of 1,10-Phenanthroline Adducts of Mononuclear Copper, Cobalt, and Nickel Chelates in the N,N,O-Ligand Environment
Garnovskii D.
Vol. 44 , pp. 596-603
437 views DOI
2017
the individual and the state as agents responsible for the production of healthy societies: a thematic analysis from the perspective of health professionals in catalonia (spain)
;Valeria Santoro Lamelas
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 45-61
269 views DOI Abstract
2016
chronic undernourishment in school-aged children: itineraries of nutritional neglect and official programs in indigenous communities of guerrero, mexico
;Paul Hersch-Martínez;Julio Pisanty-Alatorre
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 551-573
265 views DOI Abstract
2017
contraception and maternity: findings of a quali-quantitative study with 18- and 19-year-olds in four provinces of argentina
;Mónica Gogna;Georgina Binstock
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 63-72
247 views DOI Abstract
2016
an ethnographic approach to the concepts of health and disease in the turkana tribe: a project to improve the health of the nomads of the ilemi triangle, kenya
;José Javier Cardós García;Manuel Lillo Crespo;Andrés Climent Rubio;Emiliano Hernández Urrutia;Beatriz Mejias Moreno
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 173-188
222 views DOI Abstract
2016
general profile of the nutrition surplus in mexico from 1990-2013: an approach using the energy supplied by macronutrients and food groups
;José Cutberto Hernández Ramírez;Judith Elena Ortega Canto
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 487-504
213 views DOI Abstract
2011
principio de precaución en investigación biomédica, seguridad, obligaciones post-investigación y eficacia terapéutica supuesta de las drogas experimentales. violaciones a la dignidad de los pacientes
;Sergio Eduardo Gonorazky
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 149-151
184 views
2017
less well-established forms of knowledge: new positionings in the field of collective mental health
;Angel Martínez-Hernáez;Martín Correa-Urquiza
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 267-278
181 views DOI Abstract
2006
globalización, pobreza y salud: premio conferencia hugh rodman leavell
;Paulo Marchiori Buss
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 281-297
166 views Abstract
2005
la reforma del sistema de salud de los estados unidos de américa en los años ´90
;Trajano Augustus Tavares Quinhoes;Sonia Fleury
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 129-153
155 views Abstract
View All 27 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.