Indexed in Journament

russian journal of coordination chemistry/koordinatsionnaya khimiya

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
21.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,872 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 1.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name russian journal of coordination chemistry/koordinatsionnaya khimiya
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/11173

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for russian journal of coordination chemistry/koordinatsionnaya khimiya
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 31.5 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 48.7 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2016
2017
contraception and maternity: findings of a quali-quantitative study with 18- and 19-year-olds in four provinces of argentina
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 63-72
273 views DOI Abstract
2016
an ethnographic approach to the concepts of health and disease in the turkana tribe: a project to improve the health of the nomads of the ilemi triangle, kenya
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 173-188
263 views DOI Abstract
2016
general profile of the nutrition surplus in mexico from 1990-2013: an approach using the energy supplied by macronutrients and food groups
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 487-504
253 views DOI Abstract
2017
less well-established forms of knowledge: new positionings in the field of collective mental health
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 267-278
236 views DOI Abstract
2006
globalización, pobreza y salud: premio conferencia hugh rodman leavell
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 281-297
190 views Abstract
2005
la reforma del sistema de salud de los estados unidos de américa en los años ´90
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 129-153
172 views Abstract
2017
helminthology according to the philosophy of science of imre lakatos
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 139-148
160 views DOI Abstract
2017
less well-established forms of knowledge: new positionings in the field of collective mental health
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 267-278
236 views DOI Abstract
2017
contraception and maternity: findings of a quali-quantitative study with 18- and 19-year-olds in four provinces of argentina
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 63-72
273 views DOI Abstract
2016
excessive osteoporosis screening in women under 65 years: a cross-sectional study
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 443-452
114 views DOI Abstract
2016
thinking about health once again: programs and territories
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 149-171
158 views DOI Abstract
2016
general profile of the nutrition surplus in mexico from 1990-2013: an approach using the energy supplied by macronutrients and food groups
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 487-504
253 views DOI Abstract
2016
an ethnographic approach to the concepts of health and disease in the turkana tribe: a project to improve the health of the nomads of the ilemi triangle, kenya
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 173-188
263 views DOI Abstract
2016
Journament Score
21.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,872 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

21.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

31.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

48.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.