pesquisa agropecuaria brasileira | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1863 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

pesquisa agropecuaria brasileira

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name pesquisa agropecuaria brasileira
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2015
Análise comparativa de classificadores digitais em imagens do Landsat-8 aplicados ao mapeamento temático
Garofalo, Danilo Francisco Trovo;Messias, Cassiano Gustavo;Liesenberg, Veraldo;Bolfe, Édson Luis;Ferreira, Marcos César;
Vol. 50 , No. 7 , pp. 593-604
398 views Abstract
2014
Entomopathogenic nematodes for the control of phorid and sciarid flies in mushroom crops
Navarro, María Jesús;Gea, Francisco José;
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 11-17
368 views Abstract
2008
Diversidade da comunidade de plantas invasoras em sistemas agroflorestais com café em Turrialba, Costa Rica Diversity of weed community in agroforestry systems with coffee in Turrialba, Costa Rica
Ricci, Marta dos Santos Freire;Filho, Elias de Melo Virgínio;Costa, Janaina Ribeiro;
Vol. 43 , No. 7 , pp. 825-834
356 views Abstract
2001
Yellow and purple nutsedges survey in the southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
José, Eyherabide Juan;Inés, Leaden María;Sara, Alonso;
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 205-209
316 views Abstract
1999
Fatores que afetam a germinação do grão de pólen do maracujá: meios de cultura e tipos de agrotóxicos Factors affecting the grain pollen germination of yellow passion fruit: culture medium and agrotoxics
Silva, Mairon Moura da;Bruckner, Claudio Horst;Picanço, Marcelo;Cruz, Cosme Damião;
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 347-352
314 views Abstract
2010
Sample size determination of avocado shoot xylem characters by resampling
Meza-Castillo E.
Vol. 45 , pp. 1531-1535
306 views DOI
2001
Produção da bananeira 'Nanicão' em diferentes densidades de plantas e sistemas de espaçamento Yield of 'nanicão' banana at different plant densities and spacing systems
Filho, João Alexio Scarpare;Kluge, Rcardo Alfredo;
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 105-113
302 views Abstract
2013
Não normalidade multivariada e multicolinearidade na análise de trilha em milho
Toebe, Marcos;Filho, Alberto Cargnelutti;
Vol. 48 , No. 5 , pp. 466-477
295 views Abstract
2010
Seleção de clones de batata-doce resistentes a Meloidogyne incognita raça 1 Selection of sweetpotato clones resistant to Meloidogyne incognita race 1
Marchese, Aline;Maluf, Wilson Roberto;Neto, Álvaro Carlos Gonçalves;Gonçalves, Ranoel José de Sousa;Gomes, Luiz Antonio Augusto;
Vol. 45 , No. 9 , pp. 997-1004
294 views Abstract
2001
Survival of pathogens on soybean debris under no-tillage and conventional tillage systems Sobrevivência de patógenos em restos de cultura de soja mantidos em sistema de semeadura direta e convencional
Almeida, Álvaro Manuel Rodrigues;Saraiva, Odilon Ferreira;Farias, José Renato Bouças;Gaudêncio, Celso Almeida;Torres, Eleno;
Vol. 36 , No. 10 , pp. 1231-1238
283 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.