british journal of neurosurgery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3559 / 33,972
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

british journal of neurosurgery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim
Short Name br j neurosurg
Abbreviated Name br j neurosurg
ISSN 1360-046X
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/ibjn
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

1996
Traumatic cerebrospinal fluid leakage: risk factors and the use of prophylactic antibiotics
Choi D;Spann R;;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. -
384 views Abstract
2011
The protective effect of avocado soybean unsaponifilables on brain ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat prefrontal cortex.
Eser, Olcay;Songur, Ahmet;Yaman, Mehmet;Cosar, Murat;Fidan, Hüseyin;Sahin, Onder;Mollaoglu, Hakan;Buyukbas, Sadik;
Vol. 25 , No. 6 , pp. 701-6
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Penetrating head injury due to angle grinder: an occupational hazard
Khan, K.
Vol. 33 , pp. 202-206
231 views DOI
2019
Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) therapy for refractory primary headache disorders: a pilot study.
Weatherall, Mark W;Nandi, Dipankar;
, pp. 1-5
227 views DOI Abstract
2011
gillian abel / lisa fitzgerald / catherine healy / aline taylor (ed.) taking the crime out of sex work: new zealand sex workers’ fight for decriminalisation. bristol: policy press 2010.
;Lilian Türk
Vol. 04 , No. 03 , pp. 95-104
227 views
2010
becoming modern after sars. battling the h1n1 pandemic and the politics of backwardness in china′s pearl river delta
;Katherine A. Mason
Vol. 03 , No. 03 , pp. 8-35
214 views Abstract
2009
rethinking state, civil society and citizen participation. the case of the colombian paramilitaries
;Stacey L.Hunt
Vol. 02 , No. 01 , pp. 64-87
202 views Abstract
2010
is “warmth” a mode of social behaviour? considerations on a cultural history of the left-alternative milieu from the late sixties to the mid eighties
;Sven Reichardt
Vol. 03 , No. 02 , pp. 84-99
163 views Abstract
2009
gewalt diesseits, jenseits und am rande des staates. ethnologische positionen
;Thomas Zitelmann
Vol. 02 , No. 01 , pp. 20-40
104 views Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

29.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.