Indexed in Journament

presse medicale (paris, france : 1983)

ISSN 2213-0276· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,040 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
9 Articles
Scores higher than 31.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name presse med
Abbreviated Name presse med
ISSN 2213-0276
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/la-presse-medicale

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for presse medicale (paris, france : 1983)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 5.6 27.3
Innovation 57.0 28.9
Community Impact 7.1 9.7
Content Distribution 87.7 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (9)

2010
[Post-marketing safety profile of avocado-soybean unsaponifiables].
Vol. 39 , No. 10 , pp. e211-6
403 views DOI Abstract
2009
modelling the relationship between soil color and particle size for soil survey in ferralsol environments
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 93-105
318 views Abstract
2013
heavy metal status of soil and vegetables grown on peri-urban area of lahore district
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 49-54
316 views Abstract
2019
[An overview over the actual debate on the abolition of the "natural healers" in Germany].
Vol. 48 , No. 4 , pp. 343-346
290 views DOI
2012
effect of nitrogen fertilization and seedling density on fine rice yield in faisalabad, pakistan
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 152-156
268 views Abstract
2011
impact of climate change on wheat productivity in mixed cropping system of punjab
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 111-114
265 views Abstract
1995
[Candida albicans spondylodiscitis. Treatment with fluconazole alone]
Vol. 24 , No. 10 , pp. -
259 views Abstract
2015
[The adventures of Tintin at the doctor].
Vol. 44 , No. 6 Pt 1 , pp. 584-5
239 views DOI
2011
surveying tubewell water suitability for irrigation in four tehsils of district kasur
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 155-159
228 views Abstract
2019
[An overview over the actual debate on the abolition of the "natural healers" in Germany].
Vol. 48 , No. 4 , pp. 343-346
290 views DOI
2015
[The adventures of Tintin at the doctor].
Vol. 44 , No. 6 Pt 1 , pp. 584-5
239 views DOI
2013
heavy metal status of soil and vegetables grown on peri-urban area of lahore district
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 49-54
316 views Abstract
2012
effect of nitrogen fertilization and seedling density on fine rice yield in faisalabad, pakistan
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 152-156
268 views Abstract
2011
impact of climate change on wheat productivity in mixed cropping system of punjab
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 111-114
265 views Abstract
2011
surveying tubewell water suitability for irrigation in four tehsils of district kasur
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 155-159
228 views Abstract
2010
[Post-marketing safety profile of avocado-soybean unsaponifiables].
Vol. 39 , No. 10 , pp. e211-6
403 views DOI Abstract
2009
modelling the relationship between soil color and particle size for soil survey in ferralsol environments
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 93-105
318 views Abstract
1995
[Candida albicans spondylodiscitis. Treatment with fluconazole alone]
Vol. 24 , No. 10 , pp. -
259 views Abstract
Journament Score
30.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,040 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

30.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

57.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

87.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.