archives of dermatological research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1904 / 33,955
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

archives of dermatological research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name arch dermatol res
Abbreviated Name arch dermatol res
ISSN 1432-069X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/403
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2013
culture, economics, politics and knowledge as meaning-spaces in social occupational therapy: reflections on the experience of “ponto de encontro e cultura”
;Denise Dias Barros;Debora Galvani;Marta Carvalho de Almeida;Carla Regina Silva Soares
Vol. 21 , No. 03 , pp. 583-594
693 views DOI Abstract
2014
unilateral neglect syndrome after stroke: the role of occupational therapy
;Tamara Pereira de Oliveira;Rita de Cássia Tibério Araújo;Edvaldo Soares
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 419-428
662 views DOI Abstract
2011
Polyhydroxylated fatty alcohols derived from avocado suppress inflammatory response and provide non-sunscreen protection against UV-induced damage in skin cells.
Rosenblat, Gennady;Meretski, Shai;Segal, Joseph;Tarshis, Mark;Schroeder, Avi;Zanin-Zhorov, Alexandra;Lion, Gilead;Ingber, Arieh;Hochberg, Malka;
Vol. 303 , No. 4 , pp. 239-46
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
Serum amyloid A and C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate are important indicators in hidradenitis suppurativa.
Akdogan, Neslihan;Dogan, Sibel;Incel-Uysal, Pinar;Karabulut, Erdem;Topcuoglu, Canan;Yalcin, Basak;Atakan, Nilgun;
356 views DOI Abstract
2017
occupational therapists in primary care health management
;Paula Giovana Furlan; Marianna dos Santos Oliveira
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 21-31
313 views DOI Abstract
2017
Updated strategies for the management, pathogenesis and molecular genetics of different forms of ichthyosis syndromes with prominent hair abnormalities.
Rasheed, Madiha;Shahzad, Shaheen;Zaeem, Afifa;Afzal, Imran;Gul, Asma;Khalid, Sumbal;
Vol. 309 , No. 10 , pp. 773-785
296 views DOI Abstract
2016
the practice of matrix support and its effects on primary health care
;Meyrielle Belotti;Maria Cristina Campello Lavrador
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 373-378
285 views DOI Abstract
2016
youth, culture and creativity professionalization
;Carla Regina Silva;Isadora Cardinalli;Marina Sanches Silvestrini;Aline Zacchi Farias;Débora Isabele de Vasconcelos Teixeira;Ana Carolina da Silva Almeida Prado;Leticia Ambrosio;Rúbia Diana da Mota;Caio de Camargo Ishido;Marco Antonio Liu Targa Mancini
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 13-24
255 views DOI Abstract
2012
assistive technology for the promotion of activity of daily living with children in hospital contexts
;Adriana Moniz da Silveira;Regina Helena Vitale Torkomian Joaquim;Daniel Marinho Cezar da Cruz
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 183-190
248 views Abstract
2019
Herbal preparations for the treatment of hair loss.
Zgonc Škulj, Ana;Poljšak, Nina;Kočevar Glavač, Nina;Kreft, Samo;
232 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.