bulletin of entomological research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#302 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

bulletin of entomological research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name bull entomol res
Abbreviated Name bull entomol res
ISSN 1475-2670
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.cambridge.org/BER
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2011
Field optimization of the sex pheromone of Stenoma catenifer (Lepidoptera: Elachistidae): evaluation of lure types, trap height, male flight distances, and number of traps needed per avocado orchard for detection.
Hoddle, M S;Millar, J G;Hoddle, C D;Zou, Y;McElfresh, J S;Lesch, S M;
Vol. 101 , No. 2 , pp. 145-52
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of color response and activity rhythms of the invasive black planthopper (Walker, 1851) using sticky traps.
Mazza, Giuseppe;Marraccini, Daniele;Mori, Emiliano;Priori, Simone;Marianelli, Leonardo;Roversi, Pio Federico;Gargani, Elisabetta;
, pp. 1-7
284 views DOI Abstract
2019
Temperature-dependent development and survival of immature stages of the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).
Azrag, A G A;Yusuf, A A;Pirk, C W W;Niassy, S;Mbugua, K K;Babin, R;
, pp. 1-12
258 views DOI Abstract
2019
'Bottom-up' effects in a tritrophic plant-aphid-parasitoid system: Why being the perfect host can have its disadvantages.
Mehrparvar, M;Rajaei, A;Rokni, M;Balog, A;Loxdale, H D;
, pp. 1-9
253 views DOI Abstract
2012
integrating critical pedagogy theory and practice: classroom experiences in argentinean efl teacher education
;Zelmira Álvarez;Marcela Calvete;María Cristina Sarasa
Vol. 3 , pp. 60-71
239 views Abstract
2010
deep education
;Francois Victor Tochon
Vol. 1 , pp. 1-12
224 views Abstract
2012
research on the use and problems of digital video camera from the perspective of schools primary teacher of granada province
;Pablo José García Sempere
Vol. 3 , pp. 120-134
212 views Abstract
2012
study on the use of computer in practice teaching, of the primary schools teacher in the municipality of viseu
;Maria Martins de Sousa;Juan Antonio López Núñez;Juan Manuel Trujillo Torres;Donzília Ferreira de Sousa
Vol. 4.2 , pp. 48-61
208 views Abstract
2019
Shifted phenology in the pine processionary moth affects the outcome of tree–insect interaction
S. Rocha;M.C. Caldeira;Christian Burban;Carole Kerdelhue;M. Branco;
Vol. 110 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
139 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.