eating behaviors | Journament

Journal Ranking

#336 / 33,944
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

eating behaviors

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name eat behav
Abbreviated Name eat behav
ISSN 1873-7358
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/eating-behaviors
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (69 total)

2018
Postprandial gut hormone responses to Hass avocado meals and their association with visual analog scores in overweight adults: A randomized 3 × 3 crossover trial
Haddad E.
Vol. 31 , pp. 35-40
406 views DOI
2019
Movie violence acutely affects food choices in young adults.
Mattar, L;Farran, N;Abi Kharma, J;Zeeni, N;
Vol. 33 , pp. 7-12
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
The influence of social media on child feeding practices and beliefs among Hispanic mothers: A mixed methods study.
Griauzde, Dina H;Kieffer, Edith C;Domoff, Sarah E;Hess, Kristen;Feinstein, Susannah;Frank, Amy;Pike, Denise;Pesch, Megan H;
Vol. 36 , pp. 101361
339 views DOI Abstract
2017
erratum: bergmann's and allen's rules in native european and mediterranean phasmatodea
;Frontiers Production Office
Vol. 5 , pp. -
330 views DOI
2019
Development and validation of the eating disorder fear questionnaire and interview: Preliminary investigation of eating disorder fears
Levinson, C.
Vol. 35 , pp. 0-0
319 views DOI
2016
beyond traditional scientific training: the importance of community and empowerment for women in ecology and evolutionary biology
;M. Claire Horner-Devine;Joyce W Yen;Priti N Mody-Pan;Cara Margherio;Samantha Forde
Vol. 4 , pp. -
319 views DOI Abstract
2020
Psychological inflexibility moderates the relationship between thin-ideal internalization and disordered eating
Morton, C.
Vol. 36 , pp. 0-0
317 views DOI
2016
mammuthus population dynamics in late pleistocene north america: divergence, phylogeography and introgression
;Hendrik ePoinar;Ross eMacPhee;Jake eEnk;Jake eEnk;Alison eDevault;Chris eWidga;Jeff eSaunders;Paul eSzpak;John eSouthon;Jean-Marie eRouillard;Beth eShapiro;Brian eGolding;Grant eZazula;Duane eFroese;Dan eFisher
Vol. 4 , pp. -
315 views DOI Abstract
2015
the role of cva and the odorant binding protein lush in social and sexual behavior in drosophila melanogaster
;Jean-Christophe eBilleter;Joel eLevine
Vol. 3 , pp. -
308 views DOI Abstract
2014
learned predation risk management by spider mites
;Thomas eHackl;Peter eSchausberger
Vol. 2 , pp. -
304 views DOI Abstract
View All 69 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.