computers and electronics in agriculture | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3668 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
29
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

computers and electronics in agriculture

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name computers and electronics in agriculture
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0168-1699
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/computers-and-electronics-in-agriculture
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2019
A remote sensing technique for detecting laurel wilt disease in avocado in presence of other biotic and abiotic stresses
Abdulridha J.
Vol. 156 , pp. 549-557
392 views DOI
2018
Evaluating the performance of spectral features and multivariate analysis tools to detect laurel wilt disease and nutritional deficiency in avocado
Abdulridha J.
Vol. 155 , pp. 203-211
367 views DOI
2019
An Arduino-based low cost device for the measurement of the respiration rates of fruits and vegetables
González-Buesa, J.
Vol. 162 , pp. 14-20
329 views DOI
2019
An analysis of energy efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) applied in smart agriculture
Banđur, Đ.
Vol. 156 , pp. 500-507
250 views DOI
2017
factor affecting innovativeness of small and medium enterprises in the five southern border provinces
;Kritsadee Phuangrod;Sanguan Lerkiatbundit;Somnuk Aujiraponpan
Vol. 38 , No. 3 , pp. 204-211
241 views DOI Abstract
2020
ALOS-2 and Sentinel-1 SAR data sensitivity analysis to surface soil moisture over bare and vegetated agricultural fields
AliIhsan Sekertekin,Aycan Murat Marangoz,Saygin Abdikan;AliIhsan Sekertekin;Aycan Murat Marangoz;Saygin Abdikan;
Vol. 171 , pp. 105303-
239 views DOI
2016
effect of sports participation on internet addiction mediated by self-control: a case of korean adolescents
;Jae-Ahm Park;Mi-Hyang Park;Ji-Hye Shin;Bo Li;David Thomas Rolfe;Jong-Yeol Yoo;Stephen W. Dittmore
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 164-169
237 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improved premixing in-line injection system for variable-rate orchard sprayers with Arduino platform
Zhang, Z.
Vol. 162 , pp. 389-396
232 views DOI
2018
Big GIS analytics framework for agriculture supply chains: A literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives
Sharma, R.
Vol. 155 , pp. 103-120
224 views DOI
2019
An ANSYS/LS-DYNA simulation and experimental study of circular saw blade cutting system of mulberry cutting machine
Meng, Y.
Vol. 157 , pp. 38-48
202 views DOI
View All 17 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
29
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

28.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.