plants | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2882 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

plants

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name plants
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2019
Total Phenolic content, Flavonoid content and antioxidant potential of wild vegetables from western Nepal
Aryal, S.
Vol. 8 , pp. 0-0
403 views DOI
2016
impulsivity and novel object recognition test of rat model for vascular cognitive impairment after antipsychotics treatment
;Ronny T Wirasto;Irwan Supriyanto;Arif Prassetyo;Nunu N Madjid;Susini R Sari;Baiq R Rhadianaa;Heru Yulianto;Nur Arfian;Nyoman Kertia
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. -
387 views DOI Abstract
2017
Effects of silicon amendment on soilborne and fruit diseases of avocado
Dann E.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
375 views DOI
2020
Photosynthetic Traits and Nitrogen Uptake in Crops: Which Is the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi?
Raffaella Balestrini;Cecilia Brunetti;Walter Chitarra;Luca Nerva;Balestrini, Raffaella;Brunetti, Cecilia;Chitarra, Walter;Nerva, Luca;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. 1105-
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
The development and characterization of near-isogenic and pyramided lines carrying resistance genes to brown planthopper with the genetic background of japonica rice (Oryza sativa l.)
Nguyen, C.
Vol. 8 , pp. 0-0
304 views DOI
2019
Improved drought tolerance by AMF inoculation in maize (Zea mays) involves physiological and biochemical implications
Begum, N.
Vol. 8 , pp. 0-0
281 views DOI
2018
Axial and radial spatial patterns of non-structural carbohydrates in cycas micronesica stems
Marler, T.
Vol. 7 , pp. 0-0
281 views DOI
2016
correlation between clinical findings and patient’s survival rate in congenital duodenal obstruction
;Chandra Adipurwadi;Akhmad Makhmudi
Vol. 48 , No. 4 , pp. -
281 views DOI Abstract
2019
Plant cellular and molecular biotechnology: Following Mariotti’s steps
De, Paolis A.
Vol. 8 , pp. 0-0
269 views DOI
2017
simple reaction time: how it relates to body mass index (bmi), gender and handedness in ghanaian students. j med sci, volume 49, no. 1, 2017 january: 1-7 corresponding author: ampomahbrown@yahoo.com simple reaction time: how it relates to body mass index (bmi), gender and handedness in ghanaian students
;Ato Ampomah Brown;Leonard Derkyi-Kwarteng;Christian K Ackom;Ernest Addae;Francis Newton;Dennis Amoah;Dennis Nartey Blemano
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. -
261 views DOI Abstract
View All 29 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.