Indexed in Journament

twentieth century british history

ISSN 0955-2359· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
23.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,491 of 29,228 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 2.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name twentieth century british history
ISSN 0955-2359

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.1
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 1.5
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 69.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.1 30.1
Accessibility — 18.5
Timeliness 0.0 22.4
Diversity — 29.3
Innovation 1.5 32.1
Community Impact 2.9 15.2
Content Distribution 69.3 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

Words as well as Deeds: The Popular Press and Suffragette Hunger Strikes in Edwardian Britain
Vessey, David;
, pp. -
376 views Abstract
2010
‘The Digitization of Newspaper Archives: Opportunities and Challenges for Historians’
Bingham, Adrian;
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 225-231
239 views Abstract
‘She Used to Doctor Us up Herself’: Patent Medicines, Mothers, and Expertise in Early Twentieth-Century Britain
Bramwell, Erin Elizabeth;
, pp. -
212 views Abstract
2015
Duncan Tanner Essay Prize Winner 2014Against the ‘Sacred Cow’: NHS Opposition and the Fellowship for Freedom in Medicine, 1948–72
Seaton, Andrew;
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 424-449
200 views Abstract
2016
De-industrialization Not Decline: A New Meta-narrative for Post-war British History
Tomlinson, Jim;
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 76-99
199 views Abstract
2017
Telling Stories about Post-war Britain: Popular Individualism and the ‘Crisis’ of the 1970s
Robinson, Emily;Schofield, Camilla;Sutcliffe-Braithwaite, Florence;Thomlinson, Natalie;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 268-304
195 views Abstract
Civilian Specialists at War: Britain’s Transport Experts and the First World War. By Christopher Phillips
Powell, Matthew;
, pp. -
194 views Abstract
Growing Old with the Welfare State: Eight British Lives. Edited by Nick Hubble, Jennie Taylor and Philip Hew
Haire, Georgia;
, pp. -
171 views Abstract
2019
Ben Pimlott Memorial Lecture 2018The Women’s Suffrage Movement in the Balfour Family
Pedersen, Susan;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 299-320
165 views Abstract
2011
The Buchanan Report, Environment and the Problem of Traffic in 1960s Britain
Gunn, Simon;
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 521-542
159 views Abstract
2019
Annie Kenney and the Politics of Class in the Women’s Social and Political Union
Jenkins, Lyndsey;
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 477-503
10 views Abstract
2019
TCBH Duncan Tanner Essay Prize Winner 2018 Financing the Information Age: London TeleCity, the Legacy of IT-82, and the Selling of British Telecom
Ward, Jacob;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 424-446
100 views Abstract
2019
Ben Pimlott Memorial Lecture 2018The Women’s Suffrage Movement in the Balfour Family
Pedersen, Susan;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 299-320
165 views Abstract
2017
Telling Stories about Post-war Britain: Popular Individualism and the ‘Crisis’ of the 1970s
Robinson, Emily;Schofield, Camilla;Sutcliffe-Braithwaite, Florence;Thomlinson, Natalie;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 268-304
195 views Abstract
2017
Picturing Race in the British National Health Service, 1948-1988
Bivins, Roberta;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 83-109
146 views Abstract
2016
De-industrialization Not Decline: A New Meta-narrative for Post-war British History
Tomlinson, Jim;
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 76-99
199 views Abstract
2015
Duncan Tanner Essay Prize Winner 2014Against the ‘Sacred Cow’: NHS Opposition and the Fellowship for Freedom in Medicine, 1948–72
Seaton, Andrew;
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 424-449
200 views Abstract
2011
The Buchanan Report, Environment and the Problem of Traffic in 1960s Britain
Gunn, Simon;
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 521-542
159 views Abstract
2010
‘The Digitization of Newspaper Archives: Opportunities and Challenges for Historians’
Bingham, Adrian;
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 225-231
239 views Abstract
2008
Empire, Internationalism, and the Campaign against the Traffic in Women and Children in the 1920s
Gorman, Daniel;
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 186-216
102 views Abstract
Journament Score
23.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,491 of 29,228 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

23.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

1.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.