Indexed in Journament

Journal of experimental botany

ISSN 1460-2431· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,490 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
313 Articles
Scores higher than 91.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Краткое название J Exp Bot
Сокращённое название j exp bot
ISSN 1460-2431
URL http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of experimental botany
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 100.0 5.8
Diversity 44.4 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 9.3 5.8
Content Distribution 9.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (313)

2017
insomnia and neuroticism are related with depressive symptoms of medical students
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 33-38
502 views DOI Abstract
2019
Setting Research Priorities for Tackling Climate Change.
442 views DOI Abstract
2017
Transcript profiling indicates a widespread role for bacterial-type phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in malate-accumulating sink tissues.
Vol. 68 , No. 21-22 , pp. 5857-5869
435 views DOI Abstract
2017
The Arabidopsis Cys2/His2 zinc finger transcription factor ZAT18 is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to drought stress.
Vol. 68 , No. 11 , pp. 2991-3005
424 views DOI Abstract
2014
Bundle-sheath leakiness in C4 photosynthesis: a careful balancing act between CO2 concentration and assimilation.
Vol. 65 , No. 13 , pp. 3443-57
409 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Glycosyltransferase Gene OsUGT90A1 Helps Protect Plasma Membranes During Chilling Stress in Rice.
408 views DOI Abstract
2020
High CO2/hypoxia-induced softening of persimmon fruit is modulated by DkERF8/16 and DkNAC9 complexes.
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Brassicaceae flowers: diversity amid uniformity.
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
NINJA-associated ERF19 negatively regulates Arabidopsis pattern-triggered immunity.
Vol. 70 , No. 3 , pp. 1033-1047
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Autophagy is involved in assisting the replication of Bamboo mosaic virus in Nicotiana benthamiana.
Vol. 70 , No. 18 , pp. 4657-4670
363 views DOI Abstract
2026
Branching Varies with Light Limitation Scenarios in relation with Changes in Carbon Source-Sink Dynamics
DOI Abstract
2026
Haplotype-specific expression of a terpene synthase underlies linalool variation in the grapevine cultivar Riesling
DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Root-supplied ABA affects water use efficiency of ABA-deficient tomato scions
DOI Abstract
2026
Developmental roles of LSD1/KDM1A-like (LDL) proteins in plants
DOI Abstract
2026
Sugar-responsive regulation of an autophagy initiation factor shapes carbon-starvation sensitivity in Arabidopsis
DOI Abstract
2026
Maize terpene synthase 8 ( Zm TPS8) produces a blend of sesquiterpenes and contributes to defense against pests and pathogens
4 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,490 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

44.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

9.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.