environmental science \& technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1963 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

environmental science \& technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name environmental science \& technology
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2011
Control of Electrothermal Heating during Regeneration of Activated Carbon Fiber Cloth
Johnsen, David L.;Mallouk, Kaitlin E.;Rood, Mark J.
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 738-743
344 views DOI
2007
Steady-State and Dynamic Desorption of Organic Vapor from Activated Carbon with Electrothermal Swing Adsorption
Emamipour, Hamidreza;Hashisho, Zaher;Cevallos, Diego;Rood, Mark J.;Thurston, Deborah L.;Hay, K. James;Kim, Byung J.;Sullivan, Patrick D.
Vol. 41 , No. 14 , pp. 5063-5069
326 views DOI
2010
Capture and Recovery of Isobutane by Electrothermal Swing Adsorption with Post-Desorption Liquefaction
Mallouk, Kaitlin E.;Johnsen, David L.;Rood, Mark J.
Vol. 44 , No. 18 , pp. 7070-7075
258 views DOI
1978
Aeorsols and Sulfate particles
Gordon, Glen
Vol. 12 , No. 7 , pp. 744-745
223 views
2016
dampak mentoring pada keberhasilan start-up business: studi kasus pada start-up business di indonesia [mentoring the impact of success of a start-up business: a case study of a start-up business in indonesia]
;Christina Yanita Setyawati
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 290-310
210 views DOI Abstract
2015
pengaruh struktur kepemilikan, ukuran komite audit dan kualitas audit terhadap luas pengungkapan kompensasi manajemen kunci di laporan keuangan [effects of ownership structure and audit committee size on the disclosure of executive management compensation in financial statements]
;Kristiana Gabriela Astri Astasari;Yeterina Widi Nugrahanti
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 162-182
196 views DOI Abstract
2015
pengaruh kualitas layanan mobile banking (m-banking) terhadap kepuasan nasabah di indonesia [effect of mobile banking (m-banking) service quality on customer satisfaction in indonesia]
;Aditya Wardhana
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 273-284
177 views DOI Abstract
2016
uji model keseimbangan teori keagenan: pengaruh kebijakan utang dan kebijakan dividen terhadap kepemilikan manajerial [testing a model of balance agency theory: the influence of policy liabilities and dividend policy towards managerial ownership]
;Shiela Liviani;Putu Anom Mahadwartha;Liliana Inggrit Wijaya
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 102-120
150 views DOI Abstract
2017
customer showrooming behavior and the effect on salesperson performance
;Isabelle Sarah Astari;Juanna Judith Huliselan;Martinus Tjhia Tjen Jong
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 187-213
50 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of situational factors and product on consumer buying decision in hypermart at manado city
;Nova Christian Mamuaya
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 132-166
48 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.