Indexed in Journament

the british journal of nutrition

ISSN 1475-2662· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.8/100
Journament Score
#8,645
Journament Rank
21
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name br j nutr
Abbreviated Name br j nutr
ISSN 1475-2662
URL http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BJN

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2017
The effects of diurnal Ramadan fasting on energy expenditure and substrate oxidation in healthy men.
Vol. 118 , No. 12 , pp. 1023-1030
496 views DOI Abstract
2019
Whole Grain Consumption and Its Effects on Hepatic Steatosis and Liver Enzymes in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
, pp. 1-31
490 views DOI Abstract
2019
Insulin-like growth factor I, binding proteins -1 and -3, risk of type 2 diabetes and macronutrient intakes in men.
, pp. 1-7
453 views DOI Abstract
1982
Lymphocyte subpopulations and antibody levels in immunized malnourished children
Vol. 48 , No. 1 , pp. -
440 views Abstract
2012
Chronic ingestion of deoxynivalenol and fumonisin, alone or in interaction, induces morphological and immunological changes in the intestine of piglets
Vol. 107 , No. 12 , pp. -
426 views Abstract
2014
A Lactobacillus casei Shirota probiotic drink reduces antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in patients with spinal cord injuries: a randomised controlled trial
Vol. 111 , No. 4 , pp. -
425 views Abstract
2017
The effect of increased fruit and vegetable consumption on selected macronutrient and micronutrient intakes in four randomised-controlled trials.
Vol. 117 , No. 9 , pp. 1270-1278
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Glycaemic, gastrointestinal, hormonal and appetitive responses to pearl millet or oats porridge breakfasts: a randomised, crossover trial in healthy humans.
Vol. 122 , No. 10 , pp. 1142-1154
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of Dietary Acid Load and Plant-based Diet Index with Sleep, Stress, Anxiety, and Depression in Diabetic women.
, pp. 1-32
383 views DOI Abstract
2024
Temporal trends of carbonated soft-drink consumption among adolescents aged 12-15 years from eighteen countries in Africa, Asia and the Americas.
Vol. 131 , pp. 1633-1640
73 views DOI Abstract
2020
Probiotics and COVID-19: Think about the link.
, pp. 1-26
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
Salt need needs investigation.
, pp. 1-26
39 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of Dietary Acid Load and Plant-based Diet Index with Sleep, Stress, Anxiety, and Depression in Diabetic women.
, pp. 1-32
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Whole Grain Consumption and Its Effects on Hepatic Steatosis and Liver Enzymes in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
, pp. 1-31
490 views DOI Abstract
2019
Glycaemic, gastrointestinal, hormonal and appetitive responses to pearl millet or oats porridge breakfasts: a randomised, crossover trial in healthy humans.
Vol. 122 , No. 10 , pp. 1142-1154
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Street food in Dushanbe, Tajikistan: availability and nutritional value.
, pp. 1-21
207 views DOI Abstract
2019
Insulin-like growth factor I, binding proteins -1 and -3, risk of type 2 diabetes and macronutrient intakes in men.
, pp. 1-7
453 views DOI Abstract
2017
The effects of diurnal Ramadan fasting on energy expenditure and substrate oxidation in healthy men.
Vol. 118 , No. 12 , pp. 1023-1030
496 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.