materials research express | Journament

Journal Ranking

#537 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

materials research express

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name materials research express
Abbreviated Name materials research express
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/2053-1591
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (45 total)

2018
Comparative study of aluminium with SiC and TiB2 as reinforce particulate and with FEA
Rajaravi, C;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 106504
446 views DOI
2019
Synthesis and characterization of nanohybrid materials based on the sulfonated graphene oxide decorated by silver nanoparticles
Otmani L.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
358 views DOI
2016
Green synthesis and third-order nonlinear optical properties of 6-(9H-carbazol-9-yl) hexyl acetate
Chen B.
Vol. 3 , pp. 0-0
338 views DOI
2016
the analgesic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion after laparoscopic fundoplication: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
;Dale GJ;Phillips S;Falk GL
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 87-93
332 views Abstract
2019
Hardness matching of rail/wheel steels for high-speed-train based on wear rate and rolling contact fatigue performance
Shi, X.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
290 views DOI
2015
out-of-plane ultrasound-guided paravertebral blocks improve analgesic outcomes in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
;Amlong C;Guy M;Schroeder KM;Donnelly MJ
Vol. 2015 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 123-128
290 views Abstract
2018
Developing clinoptilolite nanoparticle-reinforced agar-g-poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels for plant tissue culture
Khoshbin, S.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
289 views DOI
2016
Development of hierarchical layered nanostructuredα-MoO3thin films using dc magnetron sputtering
Dayal, Saurabh;Kumar, C Sasi;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 106405
275 views DOI
2019
Process optimization for synthesis of the anticancer drug delivery vehicle P10 peptide and its interaction with doxorubicin
Ge, F.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
273 views DOI
2018
Electrical impedance spectroscopy of multiwall carbon nanotube–PDMS composites under compression
Helseth, L E;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 105002
259 views DOI
View All 45 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.