current medicinal chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#310 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

current medicinal chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name curr med chem
Abbreviated Name curr med chem
ISSN 1875-533X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2018
Click Reactions in Chemistry of Triterpenes - Advances Towards Development of Potential Therapeutics.
Pokorny, Jan;Borkova, Lucie;Urban, Milan;
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 636-658
491 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors Affecting the Metabolite Productions in Endophytes: Biotechnological Approaches for Production of Metabolites.
Morales-Sanchez, Viridiana;Fe Andres, M;Diaz, C Elisa;González-Coloma, A;
467 views DOI Abstract
2014
algoritma cpar untuk analisa data kecelakaan (studi pada kepolisian daerah sulawesi tenggara)
;Natalis Ransi;Edi Winarko
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 201-212
357 views DOI Abstract
2011
sistem pendukung keputusan klinis dengan memanfaatkan jaringan syaraf tiruan untuk mendeteksi stadium penderita kanker paru-paru jenis karsinoma bukan sel kecil
;Rio Kurniawan;Sri Hartati
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. -
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
SARS CoV-2: Recent Reports on Antiviral Therapies Based on Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Darunavir/Umifenovir, Hydroxychloroquine, Remdesivir, Favipiravir and Other Drugs for the Treatment of the New Coronavirus.
Costanzo, Michele;De Giglio, Maria Anna Rachele;Roviello, Giovanni Nicola;
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Electrochemical and Optical Biosensing Strategies for DNA Methylation Analysis.
Zhang, S;Huang, J;Lu, J R;Liu, M;Chen, X;Su, S S;Mo, F;Zheng, J S;
283 views DOI Abstract
2019
Endothelial dysfunction in dyslipidaemia: Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications.
Zaric, Bozidarka;Obradovic, Milan;Trpkovic, Andreja;Banach, Maciej;Mikhailidis, Dimitri P;Isenovic, Esma;
278 views DOI Abstract
2017
Privileged Structures in the design of Potential Drug Candidates for Neglected Diseases.
Leite, Ana Cristina Lima;Espíndola, José Wanderlan Pontes;de Oliveira Cardoso, Marcos Veríssimo;de Oliveira Filho, Gevanio Bezerra;
277 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chemical synthesis of acyclic nucleoside phosphonate analogs linked with cyclic systems between the phosphonate and the base moieties.
Shen, Guang Huan;Hong, Joon Hee;
271 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stem Cell Transplant for Advanced Stage Liver Disorders: Current Scenario and Future Prospects.
Mahmood, Anjum;Seetharaman, Rajasekar;Kshatriya, Prashant;Patel, Divyang;Srivastava, Anand S;
261 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
50
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.