bioorganic \& medicinal chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6945 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

bioorganic \& medicinal chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name bioorganic \& medicinal chemistry
Abbreviated Name bioorganic \& medicinal chemistry
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2005
Chalcones as potent tyrosinase inhibitors: the importance of a 2, 4-substituted resorcinol moiety
Khatib, Soliman;Nerya, Ohad;Musa, Ramadan;Shmuel, Maayan;Tamir, Snait;Vaya, Jacob
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 433-441
385 views
2015
Synthesis, crystal structures, and urease inhibition of an acetohydroxamate-coordinated oxovanadium (V) complex derived from N′-(3-bromo-2-hydroxybenzylidene)-4-methoxybenzohydrazide
Qu, Dan;Niu, Fang;Zhao, Xinlu;Yan, Ke-Xiang;Ye, Yu-Ting;Wang, Jia;Zhang, Mei;You, Zhonglu
Vol. 23 , No. 9 , pp. 1944-1949
303 views
2013
a move towards autonomy: individualized education plans for effective materials use
;Kenneth Cranker ;Nicole Servais
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 96-124
187 views Abstract
2013
medics on the move south africa: access to medical words
;Kris Van de Poel;Christine Fourie;Karen Seberechts
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 339-352
164 views Abstract
2004
Synthesis of some newer derivatives of substituted quinazolinonyl-2-oxo/thiobarbituric acid as potent anticonvulsant agents
Srivastava, VK;Kumar, Ashok;others
Vol. 12 , No. 5 , pp. 1257-1264
154 views
2010
a new member of the family: the sojo international learning center
;Jon Rowberry
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 59-64
147 views Abstract
2011
fostering self-directed learning through guided tasks and learner reflection
;Chris King
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 257-267
133 views Abstract
2011
the l2 passionate interactional imperative (for short “the l2 pie”): it’s hot or it’s not!
;Tim Murphey
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 87-90
119 views Abstract
2011
reading an esl writer’s text
;Paul Kei Matsuda;Michelle Cox
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 4-14
61 views Abstract
2010
an investigation of student use of a self-access english-only speaking area
;Heath Rose;Roxanne Elliott
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 32-46
61 views Abstract
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.