journal of the european academy of dermatology and venereology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#828 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

journal of the european academy of dermatology and venereology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name journal of the european academy of dermatology and venereology
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0926-9959
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14683083
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2015
essential heavy metals in renal tumor tissue and its possible relation to carcinogenesis: applying the scanning electron microscopy coupled with x-ray microanalysis technique
;Tânia Nogueira;Mariana Semedo;Elisabete Cunha
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 10-14
422 views Abstract
2019
PD-L1 expression in tumour microenvironment supports the rationale for immune checkpoint blockade in classic Kaposi's sarcoma
Genovese, G.
Vol. 33 , pp. e269-e271
319 views DOI
2004
Antifungal activity of Thymus oils and their major compounds
Pina-Vaz, C;Gon\ccalves Rodrigues, A;Pinto, E;Costa-de-Oliveira, S;Tavares, C;Salgueiro, L;Cavaleiro, C;Gon\ccalves, MJ;Martinez-de-Oliveira, J
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 73-78
318 views
2013
effect of an educational booklet on knowledge and attitude regarding major depressive disorder in medical students in delhi
;Medha Goyal;Charu Kohli;Jugal Kishore;Ram C. Jiloha
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 16-23
305 views Abstract
2013
Endothelin-1 enhances the proliferation of normal human melanocytes in a paradoxical manner from the TNF-α-inhibited condition, but tacrolimus promotes exclusively the cellular migration without proliferation: A proposed action mechanism for combination therapy of phototherapy and topical tacrolimus in vitiligo treatment
Lee, K.
Vol. 27 , pp. 609-616
304 views DOI
2019
Response to ‘Korean gender differences in hidradenitis suppurativa: nature or nurture?’
Lee, J.
Vol. 33 , pp. e257
260 views DOI
2019
Korean gender differences in hidradenitis suppuratva: nature or nurture?
Happle, R.
Vol. 33 , pp. e256
241 views DOI
2013
developing a protocol for medical student-organized community-based hypertension screening programs
;Vishal P. Varshney;Tyrone Harrison;Michal Szymczakowski;Matthew Gross;Charlotte Jones
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 8-11
201 views Abstract
2013
cerebellar syndromes: a medical student guide
;Claudia K. Sellers;Suvanka Pa
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 37-42
199 views Abstract
2016
Declarative titles in original research papers in dermatologic journals 1974-2014
Gjersvik, P.
Vol. 30 , pp. 124-125
185 views DOI
View All 15 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.