zeitschrift f\"ur naturforschung c | Journament

Journal Ranking

#122 / 33,951
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

zeitschrift f\"ur naturforschung c

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name zeitschrift f\"ur naturforschung c
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/znc/html
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2006
Antimicrobial activity of six constituents of essential oil from Salvia
Sonboli, Ali;Babakhani, Babak;Mehrabian, Ahmad Reza
Vol. 61 , No. 3-4 , pp. 160-164
291 views
2018
the role of trust and networks in developing nicaraguan farmers’ agribusiness capacities
;Dirk Hauke Landmann;Jean-Joseph Cadilhon
Vol. 119 , No. 1 , pp. 65-78
290 views Abstract
2012
alternative plant protein sources for pigs and chickens in the tropics – nutritional value and constraints: a review
;Carlos E. Lascano;Michael Peters;Jérôme Bindelle;Tassilo T. Tiemann;Siriwan D. Martens
Vol. 113 , No. 2 , pp. 101-123
275 views Abstract
2012
effects of dietary lipid source on growth, digestibility and tissue fatty acid composition of heterobranchus longifilis fingerlings
;David Friday Apata;Theophilus Olayiwola Babalola
Vol. 113 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
249 views Abstract
2006
identification of factors that influence technical efficiency of food crop production in west africa: empirical evidence from borno state, nigeria
;P. S. Amaza;Y. Bila;A. C. Iheanacho
Vol. 107 , No. 2 , pp. 139-147
247 views Abstract
2011
evaluating partial root-zone irrigation and mulching in okra (abelmoschus esculentus l.) under a sub-humid tropical climate
;Sanatan Pradhan;Narendra Nath Sahu;Pravukalyan Panigrahi
Vol. 112 , No. 2 , pp. 169-175
229 views Abstract
2014
study of individual lactation patterns of iranian dairy buffaloes
;Borhan Shokrollahi;Karim Hasanpour
Vol. 115 , No. 2 , pp. 125-133
227 views Abstract
2016
agricultural microcredit and technical efficiency: the case of smallholder rice farmers in northern ghana
;Benjamin Tetteh Anang;Stefan Bäckman;Timo Sipiläinen
Vol. 117 , No. 2 , pp. 189-202
225 views Abstract
2016
the effect of garlic extract on growth, haematology and cell-mediated immune response of newborn goat kids
;Borhan Shokrollahi;Sayed Madeh Hesami;Hasan Baneh
Vol. 117 , No. 2 , pp. 225-232
222 views Abstract
2015
factors affecting choice of financial services among rural consumers: emerging experiences from gicumbi district, northern province in rwanda
;Edward Mutandwa;Theophile Kwiringirimana
Vol. 116 , No. 2 , pp. 187-197
214 views Abstract
View All 12 Articles
44
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.