Indexed in Journament

the journal of supercritical fluids

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,323 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
47 Articles
Scores higher than 44.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name the journal of supercritical fluids

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 38.9
Innovation 40.5
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 58.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 38.9 26.1
Innovation 40.5 24.1
Community Impact 2.1 4.8
Content Distribution 58.4 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (47)

2007
Supercritical CO2 extraction of Salvia officinalis L.
Aleksovski, SA;Sovova, H
Vol. 40 , No. 2 , pp. 239-245
387 views
2002
design and flight software embedding of kompsat-2 simulator
;Sanguk Lee;Sungki Cho;Jae Hoon Kim
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 97-106
321 views DOI Abstract
2006
thermal analyses and verification for hausat-2 small satellite
;Mi-Hyeon Lee;Dong-Woon Kim;Young-Keun Chang
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 39-54
304 views DOI Abstract
2004
ccd photometry using multiple comparison stars
;Yonggi Kim;Ivan L. Andronov;Young-Beom Jeon
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 191-200
289 views DOI Abstract
2012
performance analysis for mirrors of 30 cm cryogenic space infrared telescope
;Kwijong Park;Bongkon Moon;Dae-Hee Lee;Woong-Seob Jeong;Uk-Won Nam;Youngsik Park;Jeonghyun Pyo;Wonyong Han
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 321-328
288 views DOI Abstract
2003
real - time orbit determination of low earth orbit satellites using radar system and sgp4 model
;Jae-Kwang Lee;Sung-Seub Lee;Jae-Cheol Yoon;Kyu-Hong Choi
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 21-28
279 views DOI Abstract
2002
evaluation of data quality of permanent gps stations in south korea
;Kwan-Dong Park;Ki-Nam Kim;Hyung-Chul Lim;Pil-Ho Park
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 367-376
279 views DOI Abstract
2009
analysis of kvn 21m radio antenna optics using ray-tracing method
;Jae-Han Bae;Do-Young Byun
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 187-198
260 views DOI Abstract
1999
general properties of contact binary system for mass ratio distribution
;Kyu-Dong Oh
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 31-40
259 views Abstract
2007
methodology to enhance the predictability of i/o data exchange between device and tasks
;Cheol-Hea Koo;Koon-Ho Yang;Seong-Bong Choi
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 451-456
256 views DOI Abstract
2017
chemical composition of rr lyn – an eclipsing binary system with am and λ boo type components
;Yeuncheol Jeong;Alexander V. Yushchenko;Dmytry N. Doikov;Vira F. Gopka;Volodymyr O. Yushchenko
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 75-82
144 views DOI Abstract
2016
the spectral sharpness angle of gamma-ray bursts
;Hendrik J. van Eerten;Jochen Greiner;Re’em Sari;P. Narayana Bhat;Andreas von Kienlin;William S. Paciesas;Robert D. Preece
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 109-117
201 views DOI Abstract
2016
revisiting the correlations of peak luminosity with spectral lag and peak energy of the observed gamma-ray bursts
;Yun-A Jo;Heon-Young Chang
Vol. 33 , No. 4 , pp. 247-256
198 views DOI Abstract
2016
gamma-ray emission from globular clusters
;Pak-Hin T. Tam;Chung Y. Hui;Albert K. H. Kong
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
114 views DOI Abstract
2016
evolution of spin and superorbital modulation in 4u 0114+650
;Chin-Ping Hu;Chi-Yung Ng;Yi Chou
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 173-176
60 views DOI Abstract
2014
development strategy of orbit determination system for korea’s lunar mission: lessons from esa, jaxa, isro and cnsa’s experiences
;Young-Joo Song;Sang-il Ahn;Eun-Sup Sim
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 247-264
244 views DOI Abstract
2013
jitter and jitter self-compton processes for grb high-energy emission
;Jirong Mao
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 141-143
221 views DOI Abstract
2012
performance analysis for mirrors of 30 cm cryogenic space infrared telescope
;Kwijong Park;Bongkon Moon;Dae-Hee Lee;Woong-Seob Jeong;Uk-Won Nam;Youngsik Park;Jeonghyun Pyo;Wonyong Han
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 321-328
288 views DOI Abstract
2010
global gps ionospheric modelling using spherical harmonic expansion approach
;Byung-Kyu Choi;Woo Kyung Lee;Sung-Ki Cho;Jong-Uk Park;Pil-Ho Park
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 359-366
221 views DOI Abstract
2009
on mode correlation of solar acoustic oscillations
;Heon-Young Chang
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 287-294
115 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,323 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

58.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.