Indexed in Journament

daru journal of pharmaceutical sciences

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,881 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
58 Articles
Scores higher than 35.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name daru journal of pharmaceutical sciences
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/40199

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 64.5
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 67.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for daru journal of pharmaceutical sciences
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 64.5 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 67.9 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (58)

2013
the efficacy of caudal dexmedetomidine on stress response and postoperative pain in pediatric cardiac surgery
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 109-114
421 views DOI Abstract
2012
Large scale screening of commonly used Iranian traditional medicinal plants against urease activity
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 72
393 views
2015
three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of atrial septal defects
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 69-73
379 views DOI Abstract
2012
intrathecal morphine is superior to intravenous pca in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 122-127
376 views DOI Abstract
2009
adult cardiac transplantation: a review of perioperative management (part - ii)
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 155-165
316 views Abstract
2009
treating myocardial stunning randomly, with either propofol or isoflurane following transient coronary occlusion and reperfusion in pigs
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 113-121
310 views Abstract
2017
the utility of preoperative level of erythrocytosis in the prediction of postoperative blood loss and 30-day mortality in patients with tetralogy of fallot
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 188-192
308 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative effect of grape seed extract (vitis vinifera) and ascorbic acid in oxidative stress induced by on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 45-51
306 views DOI Abstract
2017
cardiovascular operation: a significant risk factor of arytenoid cartilage dislocation/subluxation after anesthesia
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 309-312
297 views DOI Abstract
2018
mechanical discordance between left atrium and left atrial appendage
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 82-84
199 views DOI Abstract
2018
commentary: similar philosophy does not always synchronize
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 60-60
40 views DOI
2017
modifying risks to improve outcome in cardiac surgery: an anesthesiologist's perspective
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 226-233
87 views DOI Abstract
2017
cardiovascular operation: a significant risk factor of arytenoid cartilage dislocation/subluxation after anesthesia
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 309-312
297 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative effect of grape seed extract (vitis vinifera) and ascorbic acid in oxidative stress induced by on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 45-51
306 views DOI Abstract
2017
the utility of preoperative level of erythrocytosis in the prediction of postoperative blood loss and 30-day mortality in patients with tetralogy of fallot
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 188-192
308 views DOI Abstract
2017
myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation; why hasn't it convinced yet?
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 219-225
258 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparison of two doses of heparin on outcome in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients: a prospective randomized control study
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 8-13
242 views DOI Abstract
2016
sodium bicarbonate use and the risk of hypernatremia in thoracic aortic surgical patients with metabolic acidosis following deep hypothermic circulatory arrest
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 454-462
164 views DOI Abstract
2016
serum albumin perturbations in cyanotics after cardiac surgery: patterns and predictions
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 300-305
164 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,881 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

64.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.