daru journal of pharmaceutical sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2738 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

daru journal of pharmaceutical sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name daru journal of pharmaceutical sciences
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/40199
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (58 total)

2013
the efficacy of caudal dexmedetomidine on stress response and postoperative pain in pediatric cardiac surgery
;Dalia Abdelhamid Nasr;Hadeel Magdy Abdelhamid
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 109-114
392 views DOI Abstract
2012
Large scale screening of commonly used Iranian traditional medicinal plants against urease activity
Nabati, Farzaneh;Mojab, Faraz;Habibi-Rezaei, Mehran;Bagherzadeh, Kowsar;Amanlou, Massoud;Yousefi, Behnam
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 72
365 views
2012
intrathecal morphine is superior to intravenous pca in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery
;Chirojit Mukherjee;Eva Koch;Joergen Banusch;Markus Scholz;Udo X Kaisers;Joerg Ender
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 122-127
356 views DOI Abstract
2015
three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of atrial septal defects
;Charles German;Navin C Nanda
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 69-73
344 views DOI Abstract
2015
effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass
;Ram Prasad Kaushal;Ajay Vatal;Radhika Pathak
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 172-178
289 views DOI Abstract
2009
adult cardiac transplantation: a review of perioperative management (part - ii)
;Ramakrishna Harish;Jaroszewski Dawn;Arabia Francisco
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 155-165
289 views Abstract
2009
treating myocardial stunning randomly, with either propofol or isoflurane following transient coronary occlusion and reperfusion in pigs
;Urdaneta Felipe;Lobato Emilio;Kirby David;Sidi Avner
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 113-121
278 views Abstract
2017
cardiovascular operation: a significant risk factor of arytenoid cartilage dislocation/subluxation after anesthesia
;Seri Tsuru;Mayuko Wakimoto;Takeshi Iritakenishi;Makoto Ogawa;Yukio Hayashi
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 309-312
269 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative effect of grape seed extract (vitis vinifera) and ascorbic acid in oxidative stress induced by on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
;Naser Safaei;Hossein Babaei;Rasoul Azarfarin;Ahmad-Reza Jodati;Alireza Yaghoubi;Mohammad-Ali Sheikhalizadeh
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 45-51
267 views DOI Abstract
2005
Volatile oil composition of Centaurea aucheri (DC.) Wagenitz.
Asadipour, Ali;Mehrabani, Mitra;Najafi, Moslem Lari
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 160-164
257 views
View All 58 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.