Indexed in Journament

journal de la société chimique de tunisie

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,724 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 60% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal de la société chimique de tunisie

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 52.5
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 77.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal de la société chimique de tunisie
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 52.5 25.7
Community Impact 4.3 5.8
Content Distribution 77.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2016
relative risk of peanut allergy across the globe; where toxicology meets immunology
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-2
439 views DOI Abstract
2015
hypersensitivity reaction and acute respiratory distress syndrome in pyrethroid poisoning and role of steroid therapy
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 91-93
428 views DOI Abstract
2014
methadone related poisoning on the rise in tehran, iran
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 104-109
374 views Abstract
2013
2013
aluminum phosphide poisoning: a case series in north iran
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 111-113
336 views Abstract
2015
demyelinating polyneuropathy following scorpion sting envenomation; a case report and review of literature
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 161-164
322 views DOI Abstract
2016
knowledge and confidence of emergency clinicians in managing toxicological presentations
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 55-64
312 views DOI Abstract
2013
regional collaboration for strengthening medical toxicology in the asia pacific region
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 119-119
301 views
2014
non-medical use of medications in middle and low income countries
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 49-49
300 views
2005
Flavonol triglycosides from the leaves of Hammada scoparia (POMEL) ILJIN.
Vol. 7 , pp. 11-18
295 views
2017
analysis of oxidative stress in chronic exposure to petroleum hydrocarbons in karnataka, india
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 6-11
231 views DOI Abstract
2017
types of poisoning agents used in patients admitted to medical department of holy family hospital, rawalpindi (pakistan) from 2011 to 2015
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 53-57
100 views DOI
2017
non-accidental poisoning among children in rural sri lanka: a two-year cross sectional study
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 109-114
274 views DOI Abstract
2016
central nervous system neurotoxicity of chronic alcohol abuse
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 70-71
155 views DOI
2016
knowledge and confidence of emergency clinicians in managing toxicological presentations
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 55-64
312 views DOI Abstract
2016
relative risk of peanut allergy across the globe; where toxicology meets immunology
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-2
439 views DOI Abstract
2015
translational antidote research: a bedside to bench tale
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 9-12
229 views DOI Abstract
2015
demyelinating polyneuropathy following scorpion sting envenomation; a case report and review of literature
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 161-164
322 views DOI Abstract
2015
pulmonary scintiscan findings in sulfur mustard injured patients suspected for gastroesophageal reflux; a descriptive cross-sectional study
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 134-138
191 views DOI Abstract
2015
hypersensitivity reaction and acute respiratory distress syndrome in pyrethroid poisoning and role of steroid therapy
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 91-93
428 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,724 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.