journal de la société chimique de tunisie | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1250 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

journal de la société chimique de tunisie

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal de la société chimique de tunisie
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2016
relative risk of peanut allergy across the globe; where toxicology meets immunology
;Herman Gibb;Brecht Devleesschauwer;P. Michael Bolger;Janine Ezendam;Julie Cliff;Marco Zeilmaker;Philippe Jean-Paul Verger;John Pitt;Janis Baines;Gabriel Adegoke;Reza Afshari;Yan Liu;Bas Bokkers;Henk van Loveren;Marcel Mengelers;Esther Brandon;Arie Hendrik Havelaar;David C. Bellinger;Angela Randall;Mahmoud Mahmoudi
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-2
376 views DOI Abstract
2015
hypersensitivity reaction and acute respiratory distress syndrome in pyrethroid poisoning and role of steroid therapy
;Jisa George;Rupali Malik;Arun Gogna
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 91-93
356 views DOI Abstract
2014
methadone related poisoning on the rise in tehran, iran
;Kambiz Soltaninejad;Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam;Shahin Shadnia
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 104-109
319 views Abstract
2013
research priorities for medical toxicology in low and middle income countries
;Surjit Singh
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 78-78
311 views
2013
aluminum phosphide poisoning: a case series in north iran
;Anahita Nosrati;Mohammad Karami;Majid Esmaeilnia
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 111-113
289 views Abstract
2015
demyelinating polyneuropathy following scorpion sting envenomation; a case report and review of literature
;Faisal Abdullah Alsawafi;Humaid Alhinai;Badriyah Alhattali;Sabah Awad;Abdullah Alreesi;Mohammed Alshamsi
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 161-164
279 views DOI Abstract
2005
Flavonol triglycosides from the leaves of Hammada scoparia (POMEL) ILJIN.
Fakhfakh, Jawhar Abd'Elmonem;Martin, Marie Thérèse;Damak, Mohamed
Vol. 7 , pp. 11-18
263 views
2014
non-medical use of medications in middle and low income countries
;Reza Afshari
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 49-49
259 views
2013
regional collaboration for strengthening medical toxicology in the asia pacific region
;Kenneth Hartigan-Go
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 119-119
259 views
2016
knowledge and confidence of emergency clinicians in managing toxicological presentations
;Joseph Monteith;George Jelinek;jonathon Karro;Michael Cadogan;Tracey Weiland
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 55-64
258 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.