Indexed in Journament

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.9/100
Journament Score
#11,943
Journament Rank
15
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Indexings

scopus

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2017
increased detrusor collagen is associated with detrusor overactivity and decreased bladder compliance in men with benign prostatic obstruction
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 70-74
645 views DOI Abstract
2017
protective effect of chuquiraga spinosa extract on n-methyl-nitrosourea (nmu) induced prostate cancer in rats
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 47-52
524 views DOI Abstract
2016
feasibility of classical secondary hormonal therapies prior to docetaxel therapy in japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: multicenter retrospective study
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 140-144
376 views DOI Abstract
2017
impact of poor glycemic control of type 2 diabetes mellitus on serum prostate-specific antigen concentrations in men
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 104-109
264 views DOI Abstract
2016
australian patterns of prostate cancer care: are they evolving?
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 20-24
248 views DOI Abstract
2016
modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: technique and results
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 61-64
242 views DOI Abstract
2013
simple method for preventing inguinal hernias after radical retropubic prostatectomy
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 76-80
240 views DOI Abstract
2017
68ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in advanced prostate cancer: current state and future trends
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 125-129
239 views DOI Abstract
2014
combination of clinical characteristics and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to predict lobes without significant cancer: application in patient selection for hemiablative focal therapy
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 37-42
234 views DOI Abstract
2017
68ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in advanced prostate cancer: current state and future trends
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 125-129
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
impact of poor glycemic control of type 2 diabetes mellitus on serum prostate-specific antigen concentrations in men
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 104-109
264 views DOI Abstract
2017
increased detrusor collagen is associated with detrusor overactivity and decreased bladder compliance in men with benign prostatic obstruction
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 70-74
645 views DOI Abstract
2017
protective effect of chuquiraga spinosa extract on n-methyl-nitrosourea (nmu) induced prostate cancer in rats
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 47-52
524 views DOI Abstract
2016
australian patterns of prostate cancer care: are they evolving?
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 20-24
248 views DOI Abstract
2016
oxidative stress in prostate cancer patients: a systematic review of case control studies
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 71-87
231 views DOI Abstract
2016
feasibility of classical secondary hormonal therapies prior to docetaxel therapy in japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: multicenter retrospective study
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 140-144
376 views DOI Abstract
2016
modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: technique and results
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 61-64
242 views DOI Abstract
2015
focal therapy for prostate cancer: the current status
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 35-41
174 views DOI Abstract
2015
is an adjustment by transurethral surgery simultaneously needed during the suprapubic open prostatectomy?
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 31-34
205 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.