south african journal of agricultural extension | Journament

Journal Ranking

#228 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

south african journal of agricultural extension

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name south african journal of agricultural extension
Abbreviated Name south african journal of agricultural extension
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://sajae.co.za
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (32 total)

1970
Small-scale livestock farmers' participation in markets: evidence from the land reform beneficiaries in the Central Karoo, Western Cape, South Africa
Cheteni, P.;Mokhele, X.;
Vol. 47 , pp. 118--136
407 views DOI
1970
Processors preference and effectiveness of extension teaching methods used by Raw Material Research Development Council for dissemination of shea butter processing technologies in Moro Local Government Area of Kwara State Nigeria
Igene, L.;Sedibe, M. M.;Van der Westhuizen, C.;Solomon, O.;
Vol. 46 , pp. 36--44
398 views DOI
1970
An overview of perceptions and attitudes towards extension service delivery in Fezile Dabi District, Free State Province
Sebeho, M. A.;Stevens, J. B.;
Vol. 47 , pp. 61--72
361 views DOI
1970
Evaluation of South Africa's public agricultural extension in the context of sustainable agriculture
Khwidzhili, R. H.;Worth, S.;
Vol. 47 , pp. 20--35
359 views DOI
1970
Capacity development for scaling up Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) innovations: agricultural extension's role in mitigating climate change effects in Gqumashe community, Eastern Cape, South Africa
Maka, L.;Ighodaro, I. D.;Ngcobo-Ngotho, G. P. T.;
Vol. 47 , pp. 45--53
335 views DOI
1970
The level of household food security of urban farming and non-farming households in the informal settlement area of the Cape Town Metropole in South Africa
Swanepoel, J. W.;van Niekerk, J. A.;
Vol. 46 , pp. 89--106
332 views DOI
1970
Storage practices and their bearing on smallholder farmers: Postharvest analysis in Uganda
Tibaingana, A.;Kele, T.;Makombe, G.;
Vol. 46 , pp. 45--56
329 views DOI
1970
Farmers perceptions of precision agriculture and the role of agricultural extension: a case study of crop farming in the Schweizer-Reneke region, South Africa
Jacobs, A. J.;van Tol, J. J.,;Du Preez, C. C;
Vol. 46 , pp. 107--118
319 views DOI
1970
Assessment of factors influencing farmers' participation in the comprehensive agricultural support programme in Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa
Afful, D. B.;Mafsikaneng, A. N.;
Vol. 46 , pp. 79--88
318 views DOI
1970
Poultry farmers' perceptions of extension service delivery through input providers in Ogbomoso zone of Oyo State, Nigeria
Owoade, E. O.;Akinwale, J. A.;
Vol. 47 , pp. 36--44
311 views DOI
View All 32 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.