journal of combustion | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2389 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of combustion

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of combustion
Abbreviated Name journal of combustion
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2018
Experimental Investigation of Combustion Kinetics of Wood Powder and Pellet
Haobin, Peng;Li, Yuesheng;Li, Yunquan;Yuan, Fangyang;Chen, Guohua;Haobin, Peng;Li, Yuesheng;Li, Yunquan;Yuan, Fangyang;Chen, Guohua;
Vol. 2018
361 views DOI Abstract
2018
A Large Eddy Simulation Study on the Effect of Devolatilization Modelling and Char Combustion Mode Modelling on the Structure of a Large-Scale, Biomass and Coal Co-Fired Flame
Rabaçal, Miriam;Costa, Mário;Vascellari, Michele;Hasse, Christian;Rieth, Martin;Kempf, Andreas M.;Rabaçal, Miriam;Costa, Mário;Vascellari, Michele;Hasse, Christian;Rieth, Martin;Kempf, Andreas M.;
Vol. 2018
361 views DOI Abstract
2018
Simulation of Coal and Biomass Cofiring with Different Particle Density and Diameter in Bubbling Fluidized Bed under O2/CO2 Atmospheres
Chen, Chao;Wu, Xuan;Zhao, Lingling;Chen, Chao;Wu, Xuan;Zhao, Lingling;
Vol. 2018
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Building Fire: Experimental and Numerical Studies on Behaviour of Flows at Opening
Onguene Mvogo, Philippe;Mouangue, Ruben;Tégawendé Zaida, Justin;Obounou, Marcel;Ekobena Fouda, Henri;Onguene Mvogo, Philippe;Mouangue, Ruben;Tégawendé Zaida, Justin;Obounou, Marcel;Ekobena Fouda, Henri;
Vol. 2019
302 views DOI Abstract
2018
Charged Species Concentration in Combusting Mixtures Using Equilibrium Chemistry
Aithal, S. M.;Aithal, S. M.;
Vol. 2018
257 views DOI Abstract
2018
Review of Oxidation of Gasoline Surrogates and Its Components
Piehl, J. A.;Zyada, A.;Bravo, L.;Samimi-Abianeh, O.;Piehl, J. A.;Zyada, A.;Bravo, L.;Samimi-Abianeh, O.;
Vol. 2018
238 views DOI Abstract
2015
Combustion Characteristics of Butane Porous Burner for Thermoelectric Power Generation
Mustafa, K. F.;Abdullah, S.;Abdullah, M. Z.;Sopian, K.;
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
228 views Abstract
2017
urgensi lingkungan pendidikan sebagai mediasi pembentukan karakter peserta didik
;M. Hidayat Ginanjar
Vol. 2 , No. 04 , pp. -
227 views Abstract
2017
pendidikan karakter berbasis kearifan lokal
;Muhammad Priyatna
Vol. 5 , No. 10 , pp. -
217 views Abstract
2017
pengembangan nilai-nilai spiritual berbasis pesantren kilat (studi pengembangan model pembelajaran pesantren kilat yang inovatif dan efektif untuk siswa sekolah lanjutan tingkat atas)
;Endin Mujahidin
Vol. 1 , No. 02 , pp. -
201 views Abstract
View All 16 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.