international journal of telemedicine and applications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2614 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

international journal of telemedicine and applications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name int j telemed appl
Abbreviated Name international journal of telemedicine and applications
ISSN 1687-6415
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijta
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2019
Acceptability and Attitude towards a Mobile-Based Home Exercise Program among Stroke Survivors and Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study
Mahmood, Amreen;Blaizy, Vevita;Verma, Aparajita;Stephen Sequeira, Joel;Saha, Dola;Ramachandran, Selvam;Manikandan, N.;Unnikrishnan, Bhaskaran;Solomon, John M.;Mahmood, Amreen;Blaizy, Vevita;Verma, Aparajita;Stephen Sequeira, Joel;Saha, Dola;Ramachandran, Selvam;Manikandan, N.;Unnikrishnan, Bhaskaran;Solomon, John M.;
Vol. 2019
615 views DOI Abstract
2018
Use of Expectation Disconfirmation Theory to Test Patient Satisfaction with Asynchronous Telemedicine for Diabetic Retinopathy Detection
Serrano, Christina I.;Shah, Vishal;Abràmoff, Michael D.;Serrano, Christina I.;Shah, Vishal;Abràmoff, Michael D.;
Vol. 2018
377 views DOI Abstract
2018
Telemedical Coaching Improves Long-Term Weight Loss in Overweight Persons: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kempf, Kerstin;Röhling, Martin;Stichert, Monika;Fischer, Gabriele;Boschem, Elke;Könner, Jürgen;Martin, Stephan;Kempf, Kerstin;Röhling, Martin;Stichert, Monika;Fischer, Gabriele;Boschem, Elke;Könner, Jürgen;Martin, Stephan;
Vol. 2018
376 views DOI Abstract
2018
Introducing Videoconferencing on Tablet Computers in Nurse–Patient Communication: Technical and Training Challenges
Rygg, Lisbeth O.;Brataas, Hildfrid V.;Nordtug, Bente;Rygg, Lisbeth O.;Brataas, Hildfrid V.;Nordtug, Bente;
Vol. 2018
321 views DOI Abstract
2018
Telemental Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
Acharibasam, Jeremiah W.;Wynn, Rolf;Acharibasam, Jeremiah W.;Wynn, Rolf;
Vol. 2018
307 views DOI Abstract
2018
Perception among Healthcare Professionals of the Use of Social Media in Translating Research Evidence into Clinical Practice in Mangalore.
Unnikrishnan, Bhaskaran;Rathi, Priya;Shah, Daivik;Tyagi, Abhay;Rao, Anish V;Paul, Koyel;Tomy, Joe;
Vol. 2018 , pp. 7573614
260 views DOI Abstract
2018
Application of Teledermoscopy in the Diagnosis of Pigmented Lesions
Barcaui, C. B.;Lima, P. M. O.;Barcaui, C. B.;Lima, P. M. O.;
Vol. 2018
229 views DOI Abstract
2017
algorithms for traffic management in the intelligent transport systems
;Andrey Borisovich Nikolaev;Myo Thiwn Aung;Lin Aung Myo;Min Khaing Myo;Nyi Nyi Zaw Aung
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 52-64
223 views DOI Abstract
2015
improving of state regional policy mechanism at risks` conditions
;Roman Tarasovich Lukysha
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 36-44
219 views Abstract
2017
research of early stages of modeling
;Andrey Borisovich Nikolaev;Victor Yurevich Stroganov;Leonid Isaakovich Berner;Pavel Sergeevich Yakunin;Kirill Aleksandrovich Barinov
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 46-55
206 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.