international journal of rotating machinery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4036 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

international journal of rotating machinery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name international journal of rotating machinery
Abbreviated Name international journal of rotating machinery
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (48 total)

2015
challenges experienced by mothers caring for children with cerebral palsy in zambia
;Carol Singogo;Margaret Mweshi;Anthea Rhoda
Vol. 71 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
494 views DOI Abstract
2010
knowledge and affective traits of physiotherapy students to provide care for patients living with aids.
;Oyeyemi Y. Adetoyeje;Oyeyemi L. Adewale;Akinwale G. Saliu;Aderibigbe I. Olubamike;Alba G. Olufunke;U. Anjorin Olayiwola
Vol. 66 , No. 3 , pp. 15-20
419 views DOI Abstract
2006
reliability of diagnostic tests in rotator cuff muscle pathology
;R. Sadenbergh;A. Marais
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 6-12
406 views DOI Abstract
2017
knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and experience of palliative care amongst south african physiotherapists
;Brenda M. Morrow;Charlotte Barnard;Zimkhitha Luhlaza;Kelisha Naidoo;Sarah Pitt
Vol. 73 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
CFD Modelling of a Centrifugal Compressor with Experimental Validation through Radial Diffuser Static Pressure Measurement
Dewar, Brett;Tiainen, Jonna;Jaatinen-Värri, Ahti;Creamer, Mike;Dotcheva, Mariana;Radulovic, Jovana;Buick, James M.;Dewar, Brett;Tiainen, Jonna;Jaatinen-Värri, Ahti;Creamer, Mike;Dotcheva, Mariana;Radulovic, Jovana;Buick, James M.;
Vol. 2019
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
An Investigation on Speed Control of a Spindle Cluster Driven by Hydraulic Motor: Application to Metal Cutting Machines
Tran, Ngoc Hai;Le, Cung;Ngo, Anh Dung;Tran, Ngoc Hai;Le, Cung;Ngo, Anh Dung;
Vol. 2019
395 views DOI Abstract
2018
review of policy and legislative framework for disability services in namibia
;Tonderai W. Shumba;Indres Moodley
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
382 views DOI Abstract
2016
a randomised controlled trial of ‘clockwise’ ultrasound for low back pain
;Adriaan Louw;Kory Zimney;Merrill R. Landers;Mark Luttrell;Bob Clair;Joshua Mills
Vol. 72 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e7
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
On the Rotor Stator Interaction Effects of Low Specific Speed Francis Turbines
Agnalt, Einar;Iliev, Igor;Solemslie, Bjørn W.;Dahlhaug, Ole G.;Agnalt, Einar;Iliev, Igor;Solemslie, Bjørn W.;Dahlhaug, Ole G.;
Vol. 2019
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and Experimental Validation of Auxiliary Rolling Bearing Models for Active Magnetic Bearings (AMBs) Applications
Tangredi, Anna;Meli, Enrico;Rindi, Andrea;Ridolfi, Alessandro;D’Adamio, Pierluca;Frilli, Amedeo;Fioravanti, Duccio;Defoy, Benjamin;Tangredi, Anna;Meli, Enrico;Rindi, Andrea;Ridolfi, Alessandro;D’Adamio, Pierluca;Frilli, Amedeo;Fioravanti, Duccio;Defoy, Benjamin;
Vol. 2019
315 views DOI Abstract
View All 48 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.