Indexed in Journament

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease

ISSN 2426-0266· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,153 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
8 Articles
Scores higher than 85.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Prev Alzheimers Dis
Abbreviated Name the journal of prevention of alzheimer's disease
ISSN 2426-0266

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 40.5
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 81.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 40.5 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 81.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2019
Assessment of Clinical Meaningfulness of Endpoints in the Generation Program by the Insights to Model Alzheimer's Progression in Real Life (iMAP) Study
Graf, A.
Vol. 6 , pp. 85-89
212 views DOI
2024
Longitudinal Evolution of Financial Capacity and Cerebral Tau and Amyloid Burden in Older Adults with Normal Cognition or Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Mimmack, K J;Sprague, E H;Amariglio, R E;Vannini, P;Marshall, G A;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 966-974
150 views DOI Abstract
2024
Amyloid and Tau Prediction of Cognitive and Functional Decline in Unimpaired Older Individuals: Longitudinal Data from the A4 and LEARN Studies.
Sperling, R A;Donohue, M C;Rissman, R A;Johnson, K A;Rentz, D M;Grill, J D;Heidebrink, J L;Jenkins, C;Jimenez-Maggiora, G;Langford, O;Liu, A;Raman, R;Yaari, R;Holdridge, K C;Sims, J R;Aisen, P S;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 802-813
141 views DOI Abstract
2024
Longitudinal Trajectories of the Cognitive Function Index in the A4 Study.
Amariglio, R E;Grill, J D;Rentz, D M;Marshall, G A;Donohue, M C;Liu, A;Aisen, P S;Sperling, R A;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 838-845
132 views DOI Abstract
2024
Change in Digital Cognitive Test Performance between Solanezumab and Placebo Groups in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease: Secondary Analyses from the A4 Study.
Papp, K V;Maruff, P;Rentz, D M;Donohue, M C;Liu, A;Aisen, P S;Sperling, R A;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 846-856
129 views DOI Abstract
2024
Safety Profile of a Cognitively Unimpaired Older Population with Elevated Cerebral Amyloid in a 4.5-Year Clinical Trial.
Yaari, R;Holdridge, K C;Mancini, M;Rafii, M S;Case, M;Battioui, C;Sims, J R;Aisen, P S;Sperling, R A;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 857-868
123 views DOI Abstract
2024
Relationship between Plasma P-Tau217 and Amyloid PET in Racial and Ethnic Underrepresented Groups (RE-URG) Compared with Non RE-URG in LEARN and A4.
Molina-Henry, D;Langford, O;Donohue, M C;Raman, R;Aisen, P;Johnson, K A;Rissman, R A;Sperling, R;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 831-837
104 views DOI Abstract
2024
Characterizing Clinical Progression in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Individuals with Brain Amyloid: Results from the A4 Study.
Rentz, D M;Rosenberg, P B;Sperling, R A;Donohue, M C;Raman, R;Liu, A;Aisen, P S;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 814-822
94 views DOI Abstract
2024
Amyloid and Tau Prediction of Cognitive and Functional Decline in Unimpaired Older Individuals: Longitudinal Data from the A4 and LEARN Studies.
Sperling, R A;Donohue, M C;Rissman, R A;Johnson, K A;Rentz, D M;Grill, J D;Heidebrink, J L;Jenkins, C;Jimenez-Maggiora, G;Langford, O;Liu, A;Raman, R;Yaari, R;Holdridge, K C;Sims, J R;Aisen, P S;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 802-813
141 views DOI Abstract
2024
Characterizing Clinical Progression in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Individuals with Brain Amyloid: Results from the A4 Study.
Rentz, D M;Rosenberg, P B;Sperling, R A;Donohue, M C;Raman, R;Liu, A;Aisen, P S;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 814-822
94 views DOI Abstract
2024
Relationship between Plasma P-Tau217 and Amyloid PET in Racial and Ethnic Underrepresented Groups (RE-URG) Compared with Non RE-URG in LEARN and A4.
Molina-Henry, D;Langford, O;Donohue, M C;Raman, R;Aisen, P;Johnson, K A;Rissman, R A;Sperling, R;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 831-837
104 views DOI Abstract
2024
Longitudinal Trajectories of the Cognitive Function Index in the A4 Study.
Amariglio, R E;Grill, J D;Rentz, D M;Marshall, G A;Donohue, M C;Liu, A;Aisen, P S;Sperling, R A;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 838-845
132 views DOI Abstract
2024
Change in Digital Cognitive Test Performance between Solanezumab and Placebo Groups in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease: Secondary Analyses from the A4 Study.
Papp, K V;Maruff, P;Rentz, D M;Donohue, M C;Liu, A;Aisen, P S;Sperling, R A;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 846-856
129 views DOI Abstract
2024
Safety Profile of a Cognitively Unimpaired Older Population with Elevated Cerebral Amyloid in a 4.5-Year Clinical Trial.
Yaari, R;Holdridge, K C;Mancini, M;Rafii, M S;Case, M;Battioui, C;Sims, J R;Aisen, P S;Sperling, R A;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 857-868
123 views DOI Abstract
2024
Longitudinal Evolution of Financial Capacity and Cerebral Tau and Amyloid Burden in Older Adults with Normal Cognition or Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Mimmack, K J;Sprague, E H;Amariglio, R E;Vannini, P;Marshall, G A;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 966-974
150 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of Clinical Meaningfulness of Endpoints in the Generation Program by the Insights to Model Alzheimer's Progression in Real Life (iMAP) Study
Graf, A.
Vol. 6 , pp. 85-89
212 views DOI
Journament Score
37.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,153 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.