international journal of nephrology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5961 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

international journal of nephrology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name international journal of nephrology
Abbreviated Name international journal of nephrology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (43 total)

2019
Prevalence and Predictors of Chronic Kidney Disease in a Semiurban Community in Lagos
Chukwuonye, Innocent Ijezie;Ohagwu, Kenneth Arinze;Adelowo, Olufemi Oladipo;Chuku, Abali;Obi, Emmanuel Chukwuebuka;Onwuchekwa, Uwa;Anyabolu, Ernest Ndukaife;Oviasu, Efosa;Chukwuonye, Innocent Ijezie;Ohagwu, Kenneth Arinze;Adelowo, Olufemi Oladipo;Chuku, Abali;Obi, Emmanuel Chukwuebuka;Onwuchekwa, Uwa;Anyabolu, Ernest Ndukaife;Oviasu, Efosa;
Vol. 2019
607 views DOI Abstract
2019
Variation in Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection: A National Assessment of Nephrology Practice
Peabody, John;Billings, Paul;Valdenor, Czarlota;Demko, Zach;Moshkevich, Solomon;Paculdo, David;Tran, Mary;Peabody, John;Billings, Paul;Valdenor, Czarlota;Demko, Zach;Moshkevich, Solomon;Paculdo, David;Tran, Mary;
Vol. 2019
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychosocial Mediators between Socioeconomic Status and Dietary Restrictions among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis in Japan
Sugisawa, Hidehiro;Shinoda, Toshio;Shimizu, Yumiko;Kumagai, Tamaki;Sugisaki, Hiroaki;Sugisawa, Hidehiro;Shinoda, Toshio;Shimizu, Yumiko;Kumagai, Tamaki;Sugisaki, Hiroaki;
Vol. 2019
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Kidney Injury Molecule 1 (KIM-1) as an Early Predictor for Acute Kidney Injury in Post-Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) in Open Heart Surgery Patients
Khreba, Nora A.;Abdelsalam, Mostafa;Wahab, A. M.;Sanad, Mohammed;Elhelaly, Rania;Adel, Mohammed;El-Kannishy, Ghada;Khreba, Nora A.;Abdelsalam, Mostafa;Wahab, A. M.;Sanad, Mohammed;Elhelaly, Rania;Adel, Mohammed;El-Kannishy, Ghada;
Vol. 2019
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Regulation of (Pro)Renin Receptor in Renin-Positive Smooth Muscle Cells of Kidney Arterioles in Rats with STZ-Induced Diabetes
Razga, Zsolt;Kovacs, Gabor;Bódi, Nikolett;Talapka, Petra;Bagyánszki, Mária;Razga, Zsolt;Kovacs, Gabor;Bódi, Nikolett;Talapka, Petra;Bagyánszki, Mária;
Vol. 2019
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Urinary Uromodulin Levels and UMOD Variants in Black South Africans with Hypertension-Attributed Chronic Kidney Disease
Nqebelele, Nolubabalo Unati;Dickens, Caroline;Dix-Peek, Therese;Duarte, Raquel;Naicker, Saraladevi;Nqebelele, Nolubabalo Unati;Dickens, Caroline;Dix-Peek, Therese;Duarte, Raquel;Naicker, Saraladevi;
Vol. 2019
290 views DOI Abstract
2015
análise experimental do efeito de diversas configurações de “inset feed” na alimentação de antenas planares dos tipos retangular, circular e triangular
;Jefferson Costa e Silva
Vol. 1 , No. 24 , pp. 49-56
258 views DOI
2015
codi4in + movieshow: em busca de personalização de consultas baseadas no contexto do usuário
;Marcelo Freitas;Livio Ribeiro;Thiago Moura;Damires Souza
Vol. 1 , No. 21 , pp. 102-110
216 views DOI
2015
perfil das mães de recém-nascidos pré-termo e/ou de baixo peso assistidos pelo método mãe canguru
;Aline de Sousa Alves;Jandeyse Karrollyne de Souza Feitosa;Lavoisier Morais de Medeiros;Samara Campos de Assis;Aucelia Cristina Soares Belchior
Vol. 1 , No. 27 , pp. 39-46
210 views DOI Abstract
2007
um experimento didático em termogravimetria: estudo da degradação térmica de amostras comerciais de pvc e pvac
;Robson Fernandes de Farias
Vol. 1 , No. 15 , pp. 117-126
203 views DOI
View All 43 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.