Indexed in Journament

nuclear physics b - proceedings supplements

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,031 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 58.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name nuclear physics b - proceedings supplements
Abbreviated Name nuclear physics b - proceedings supplements

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 79.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for nuclear physics b - proceedings supplements
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 4.4
Content Distribution 79.5 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2011
Double beta decay experiments: past and present achievements
Vol. 221 , pp. 26-31
324 views DOI
1988
Results on the impact parameter trigger for the selection of charmed particles
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 303-310
309 views DOI
2003
Direct neutrino mass experiments - present and future
Vol. 118 , pp. 279-286
306 views DOI
2001
TWIST- The TRIUMF weak interaction symmetry test the Michel parameters from μ+ decay
Vol. 98 , No. 1-3 , pp. 247-254
302 views DOI Abstract
2003
The salt phase of the sudbury neutrino observatory
Vol. 118 , pp. 444-
292 views DOI
1993
Recent results on CP violation from the CPLEAR experiment
Vol. 31 , pp. 196-199
281 views DOI Abstract
1991
A new detector for solar neutrino
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 159-169
279 views DOI Abstract
2005
Studying Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos with the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Vol. 143 , pp. 490-
273 views DOI
2003
Neutral current and day night measurements from the pure D2O phase of SNO
Vol. 118 , pp. 3-14
270 views DOI
2012
Cosmic Neutrino Background Limits at the KATRIN Experiment and Beyond
, pp. 476-
266 views DOI
2012
Project 8: Using Radio-Frequency Techniques to Measure Neutrino Mass
, pp. 371-375
264 views DOI
2012
Cosmic Neutrino Background Limits at the KATRIN Experiment and Beyond
, pp. 476-
266 views DOI
2011
Pulse shape and segmentation analysis in germanium detectors for ββ decay
Vol. 221 , pp. 346-
260 views DOI
2011
Borexino: recent results, detector calibration and future perspectives
Vol. 217 , No. 1 , pp. 101-106
237 views DOI Abstract
2011
Double beta decay experiments: past and present achievements
Vol. 221 , pp. 26-31
324 views DOI
2009
200 days of Borexino data
Vol. 188 , pp. 90-95
201 views DOI
2007
Gallium data variability and KamLAND
Vol. 168 , pp. 137-139
165 views DOI
2007
The GNAM system in the ATLAS online monitoring framework
Vol. 172 , pp. 317-320
204 views DOI Abstract
2005
Nemo-3 double beta decay experiment: Present status
Vol. 138 , pp. 207-209
261 views DOI
2005
Studying Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos with the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Vol. 143 , pp. 490-
273 views DOI
Journament Score
32.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,031 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.