Indexed in Journament

international journal of hepatology

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
19.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #29,046 of 29,228 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 0.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of hepatology
Abbreviated Name international journal of hepatology

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 22.2
Innovation 1.5
Community Impact 1.4
Content Distribution 50.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international journal of hepatology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 18.5
Timeliness 0.0 22.4
Diversity 22.2 29.3
Innovation 1.5 32.1
Community Impact 1.4 15.2
Content Distribution 50.1 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2019
Ability of the Short Physical Performance Battery Frailty Index to Predict Mortality and Hospital Readmission in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
Vol. 2019
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diagnostic Utility of Serum Ascites Lipid and Protein Gradients in Differentiation of Ascites
Vol. 2019
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dilatation Therapy and Demographic Characteristics Significantly Influence the Amount of Propofol for Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography
Vol. 2019
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Plus Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts the Outcomes after Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Vol. 2019
297 views DOI Abstract
2014
a comparative study to evaluate the educational impact of e-learning tools on griffith university pharmacy students’ level of understanding using bloom’s and solo taxonomies
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
247 views DOI Abstract
2012
caregiving involvement, job condition, and job satisfaction of infant-toddler child-care teachers in the united states
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
191 views DOI Abstract
2018
immediate uptake of phonological corrective feedback in language learning and retention
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
181 views DOI Abstract
2017
measuring student transformation in entrepreneurship education programs
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
171 views DOI Abstract
2011
will mobile learning bring a paradigm shift in higher education?
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
160 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dilatation Therapy and Demographic Characteristics Significantly Influence the Amount of Propofol for Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography
Vol. 2019
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diagnostic Utility of Serum Ascites Lipid and Protein Gradients in Differentiation of Ascites
Vol. 2019
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Plus Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts the Outcomes after Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Vol. 2019
297 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ability of the Short Physical Performance Battery Frailty Index to Predict Mortality and Hospital Readmission in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
Vol. 2019
367 views DOI Abstract
2018
immediate uptake of phonological corrective feedback in language learning and retention
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
181 views DOI Abstract
2017
creativity as a stepping stone towards developing other competencies in classrooms
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
104 views DOI Abstract
2017
measuring student transformation in entrepreneurship education programs
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
171 views DOI Abstract
2017
entrepreneurship education with impact: opening the black box
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
139 views DOI
2016
the effect of individualized instruction system on the academic achievement scores of students
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
105 views DOI Abstract
2016
how environmental attitudes interact with cognitive learning in a science lesson module
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
16 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
19.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #29,046 of 29,228 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

19.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

22.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

1.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

1.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

50.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.