international journal of food science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8885 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

international journal of food science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name int j food sci
Abbreviated Name international journal of food science
ISSN 2314-5765
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijfs
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2019
The Effect of Different Amounts of Cinnamon Consumption on Blood Glucose in Healthy Adult Individuals
Kizilaslan, Nildem;Erdem, Nihal Zekiye;Kizilaslan, Nildem;Erdem, Nihal Zekiye;
Vol. 2019
510 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fresh Pomegranate Juice Decreases Fasting Serum Erythropoietin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Banihani, Saleem A.;Shuaibu, Shuaibu M.;Al-Husein, Belal A.;Makahleh, Seham S.;Banihani, Saleem A.;Shuaibu, Shuaibu M.;Al-Husein, Belal A.;Makahleh, Seham S.;
Vol. 2019
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nutritional, Physicochemical, and Sensorial Evaluation of Flat Bread Supplemented with Quinoa Flour
El-Sohaimy, S. A.;Shehata, M. G.;Mehany, Taha;Zeitoun, M. A.;El-Sohaimy, S. A.;Shehata, M. G.;Mehany, Taha;Zeitoun, M. A.;
Vol. 2019
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Extraction and Characterisation of African Star Apple (Chrysophyllum albidum) Seed Oil and the Adsorptive Properties of the Fruit Shell in Ghana
Anang, Michael A.;Oteng-Peprah, Michael;Opoku-Boadu, Kwasi;Anang, Michael A.;Oteng-Peprah, Michael;Opoku-Boadu, Kwasi;
Vol. 2019
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Indigenous Subarctic Food Systems in Transition: Amino Acid Composition (Including Tryptophan) in Wild-Harvested and Processed Meats.
Spiegelaar, Nicole;Martin, Ian D;Tsuji, Leonard J S;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 7096416
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Induced Ripening Agents and Their Effect on Fruit Quality of Banana
Maduwanthi, S. D. T.;Marapana, R. A. U. J.;Maduwanthi, S. D. T.;Marapana, R. A. U. J.;
Vol. 2019
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Significance and Characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes in Poultry Products
Jamshidi, Abdollah;Zeinali, Tayebeh;Jamshidi, Abdollah;Zeinali, Tayebeh;
Vol. 2019
277 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular Characterization of Fermenting Yeast Species from Fermented Teff Dough during Preparation of Injera Using ITS DNA Sequence
Tadesse, B.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 0-0
254 views DOI
2015
bayang-bayang teori keagenan pada produk pembiayaan perbankan syariah
;Misnen Ardiansyah
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 251-269
166 views DOI Abstract
2017
cover jurnal
;Vol. 16 No.2 Desember 2016
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. -
164 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.