Indexed in Journament

Annals of plastic surgery

ISSN 1536-3708· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #2,949 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
109 Articles
Scores higher than 89.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

الاسم المختصر Ann Plast Surg
الاسم المختصر ann plast surg
ISSN 1536-3708
URL https://journals.lww.com/annalsplasticsurgery/pages/default.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 57.1 22.2
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.1
Content Distribution 56.9 88.9
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (109)

2019
The Economic Impact of Flexor Tendon Lacerations of the Hand in the United States.
Mehrzad, Raman;Mookerjee, Vikram;Schmidt, Scott;Jehle, Charles C;Kiwanuka, Elizabeth;Liu, Paul Y;
Vol. 83 , No. 4 , pp. 419-423
401 views DOI Abstract
2015
Comparison of Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation on Platelet-Rich Plasma and Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cell Using Rat Zygomatic Bone Defect Model.
Kapi, Emin;Bozkurt, Mehmet;Selcuk, Caferi Tayyar;Celik, Mehmet Salih;Akpolat, Veysi;Isik, Fatma Birgul;Bozarslan, Beri Hocaoglu;Celik, Yusuf;
Vol. 75 , No. 5 , pp. 565-71
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Complications After Immediate 2-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Deeper Look at the Second Stage.
Park, Jin-Woo;Jung, Jae Hoon;Jeon, Byung-Joon;Mun, Goo-Hyun;Bang, Sa Ik;Pyon, Jai-Kyong;
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Temporary Migration for Training: A Special Case.
Abdelrahman, Mohammed;Yvon, Adrien;Chen, Yu-Ray;Grant, Janet;
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Injectable Microannealed Porous Scaffold for Articular Cartilage Regeneration.
Schaeffer, Christine;Pfaff, Blaise N;Cornell, Nicholas J;Salopek, Lisa S;Shan, Sarah;Viyar, Jan;Omesiete, Wilson;Griffin, Donald R;Cottler, Patrick S;DeGeorge, Brent R;
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rembrandt's Aging Face in Plastic Surgical Perspective.
Hage, J Joris;Lange, Jan;Karim, Refaat B;
360 views DOI Abstract
2004
Prevention of peritendinous adhesions following flexor tendon injury with seprafilm.
Menderes, Adnan;Mola, Fahri;Tayfur, Volkan;Vayvada, Haluk;Barutçu, Ali;
Vol. 53 , No. 6 , pp. 560-4
338 views Abstract
2015
wortschatzerwerb und strategieneinsatz bei mehrsprachigen lernenden. aktivierung von wissen und erfolgreiche verknüpfung beim lesen auf verständnis in einer fremdsprache
;Paola de Matteis
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. -
312 views
2011
A successful neurotization of two different muscles using a single intact motor nerve: experimental study on rats.
Balik, Ozan;Menderes, Adnan;
Vol. 66 , No. 2 , pp. 172-8
284 views DOI Abstract
2021
External Splinting Is Not Mandatory After All Rhinoplasties: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Cabbarzade, Cavid;Yücel, Ömer Taşkin;Sözen, Tevfik;Ozgen, Burce;
Vol. 86 , No. 4 , pp. 376-380
281 views DOI Abstract
2024
Comparative Analysis of Recurrence-Free Survival and Mortality in Postmastectomy Patients: Insights From Multidecade, Multiinstitutional Propensity Score Matching.
Chen, Yunchan;Alston, Chase;Chadab, Tara M;Asadourian, Paul;Black, Grant G;Rohde, Christine H;Otterburn, David M;
Vol. 92 , No. 4S Suppl 2 , pp. S105-S111
106 views DOI Abstract
2024
Impact of Comorbidities on Sensory Return After Breast Reconstruction.
Qin, Nancy;Black, Grant G;Chen, Yunchan;Wang, Marcos Lu;Huang, Hao;Otterburn, David M;
Vol. 92 , No. 4S Suppl 2 , pp. S185-S190
128 views DOI Abstract
2024
Parental Education for the Prevention of Plagiocephaly.
Chekmeyan, Mariam;Joo, Alex;Saini, Sashrika;Li, Danielle;Playter, Katharine;Nguyen, Lisa;Vining, Mark;Lalikos, Janice;
Vol. 92 , No. 4S Suppl 2 , pp. S204-S206
109 views DOI Abstract
2024
Replacing the Scalpel With a Computer Mouse: An Evaluation of Time Spent on Electronic Health Record for Plastic Surgery Residents and Its Impact on Resident Training.
Oxford, Madison A;McLaughlin, Caroline M;McLaughlin, Christopher J;Johnson, T Shane;Roberts, John M;
Vol. 92 , No. 4S Suppl 2 , pp. S271-S274
117 views DOI Abstract
2024
Women in Plastic Surgery Innovation: A 10-Year Review of Gender Representation in Mammary Device Patents.
Xun, Helen;Foppiani, Jose A;Bustos, Valeria P;Valentine, Lauren;Weidman, Allan;Hernandez Alvarez, Angelica;Kinney, JacqueLyn;Verbat, Miroslava;Boustany, Ashley;Lee, Bernard T;Lin, Samuel J;
Vol. 92 , No. 4S Suppl 2 , pp. S305-S308
121 views DOI Abstract
2021
External Splinting Is Not Mandatory After All Rhinoplasties: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Cabbarzade, Cavid;Yücel, Ömer Taşkin;Sözen, Tevfik;Ozgen, Burce;
Vol. 86 , No. 4 , pp. 376-380
281 views DOI Abstract
2020
Injectable Microannealed Porous Scaffold for Articular Cartilage Regeneration.
Schaeffer, Christine;Pfaff, Blaise N;Cornell, Nicholas J;Salopek, Lisa S;Shan, Sarah;Viyar, Jan;Omesiete, Wilson;Griffin, Donald R;Cottler, Patrick S;DeGeorge, Brent R;
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Complications After Immediate 2-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Deeper Look at the Second Stage.
Park, Jin-Woo;Jung, Jae Hoon;Jeon, Byung-Joon;Mun, Goo-Hyun;Bang, Sa Ik;Pyon, Jai-Kyong;
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Economic Impact of Flexor Tendon Lacerations of the Hand in the United States.
Mehrzad, Raman;Mookerjee, Vikram;Schmidt, Scott;Jehle, Charles C;Kiwanuka, Elizabeth;Liu, Paul Y;
Vol. 83 , No. 4 , pp. 419-423
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Temporary Migration for Training: A Special Case.
Abdelrahman, Mohammed;Yvon, Adrien;Chen, Yu-Ray;Grant, Janet;
381 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #2,949 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

57.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

56.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.