Indexed in Journament

critical care research and practice

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.6/100
Journament Score
#9,022
Journament Rank
20
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name critical care research and practice
Abbreviated Name critical care research and practice

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2019
Modified Sick Neonatal Score (MSNS): A Novel Neonatal Disease Severity Scoring System for Resource-Limited Settings
Vol. 2019
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
Urine β-2-Microglobulin, Osteopontin, and Trefoil Factor 3 May Early Predict Acute Kidney Injury and Outcome after Cardiac Arrest
Vol. 2019
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of Maltase Glucoamylase as a Biomarker of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Cirrhosis
Vol. 2019
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Renal Replacement Therapy in the Critical Care Setting
Vol. 2019
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety
Vol. 2019
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship between Microcirculatory Perfusion and Arterial Elastance: A Pilot Study
Vol. 2019
320 views DOI
2017
Challenges with Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Units in South Africa
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
313 views Abstract
2017
photocatalytic degradation of anionic azo dyes acid orange 7 and acid red 88 in aqueous solutions using tio2-containing hydrogel
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 53-63
312 views DOI Abstract
2016
quantification of radicals generated in a sonicator
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 139-147
281 views DOI Abstract
2019
Urine β-2-Microglobulin, Osteopontin, and Trefoil Factor 3 May Early Predict Acute Kidney Injury and Outcome after Cardiac Arrest
Vol. 2019
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of Maltase Glucoamylase as a Biomarker of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Cirrhosis
Vol. 2019
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modified Sick Neonatal Score (MSNS): A Novel Neonatal Disease Severity Scoring System for Resource-Limited Settings
Vol. 2019
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship between Microcirculatory Perfusion and Arterial Elastance: A Pilot Study
Vol. 2019
320 views DOI
2019
Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety
Vol. 2019
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
Renal Replacement Therapy in the Critical Care Setting
Vol. 2019
344 views DOI Abstract
2017
air-assisted liquid liquid microextraction combined with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry for preconcentration and determination of trace amount of co(ii) and ni(ii) ions in water samples
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 227-238
224 views DOI Abstract
2017
a method based on ultrasound-assisted solidification of floating drop microextraction technique for the spectrophotometric determination of curcumin in turmeric powder
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
spectrophotometric multicomponent analysis of ternary and quaternary drug mixtures in human urine samples by analyzing first-order data
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 91-103
135 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.