dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra | Journament

Journal Ranking

#306 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 14 hours ago

dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name dement geriatr cogn dis extra
Abbreviated Name dement geriatr cogn dis extra
ISSN 1664-5464
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

Novel Face-Name Paired Associate Learning and Famous Face Recognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Neuropsychological and Brain Volumetric Study.
Nanda, Satyan;Mohanan, Nandini;Kumari, Sheela;Mathew, Mridula;Ramachandran, Sushama;Rajesh Pillai, P G;Kesavadas, Chandrasekharan;Sarma P, Sankara;Menon, Ramshekhar N;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 114-128
361 views DOI Abstract
Association between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Dementia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.
Wang, Ying;Li, Xiaotong;Wei, Biying;Tung, Tao-Hsin;Tao, Ping;Chien, Ching-Wen;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 250-259
292 views DOI Abstract
2014
patterns of macroinvertebrate and fish diversity in freshwater sulphide springs
;Ryan Greenway;Lenin Arias-Rodriguez;Pete Diaz;Michael Tobler
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 597-632
264 views DOI Abstract
2016
citric acid injections: an accessible and efficient method for controlling outbreaks of the crown-of-thorns starfish acanthaster cf. solaris
;Alexander C. E. Buck;Naomi M. Gardiner;Lisa Boström-Einarsson
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 28-
255 views DOI Abstract
2018
genotyping by sequencing reasserts the close relationship between tef and its putative wild eragrostis progenitors
;Dejene Girma;Gina Cannarozzi;Annett Weichert;Zerihun Tadele
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 17-
240 views DOI Abstract
2014
extinction resilience of island species: an amphibian case and a predictive model
;Cristian R. Altaba
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 43-71
236 views DOI Abstract
2011
genetic diversity in jatropha curcas populations in the state of chiapas, mexico
;Miguel Salvador-Figueroa;Lourdes Adriano-Anaya;Juan Núñez-Farfán;Francisco Espinosa-García;Adriana Sánchez-Gutiérrez;Isidro Ovando-Medina
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 641-659
233 views DOI Abstract
2010
genetic diversity of the pm3 powdery mildew resistance alleles in wheat gene bank accessions as assessed by molecular markers
;Navreet K. Bhullar;Michael Mackay;Beat Keller
Vol. 2 , No. 5 , pp. 768-786
231 views DOI Abstract
2014
phytoplankton communities in green bay, lake michigan after invasion by dreissenid mussels: increased dominance by cyanobacteria
;Bart T. De Stasio;Michael B. Schrimpf;Brendan H. Cornwell
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 681-704
230 views DOI Abstract
2014
diversity and spatial distribution of extant freshwater ostracodes (crustacea) in ancient lake ohrid (macedonia/albania)
;Julia Lorenschat;Liseth Pérez;Alexander Correa-Metrio;Mark Brenner;Ullrich von Bramann;Antje Schwalb
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 524-550
229 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.