behavioural neurology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#372 / 33,947
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

behavioural neurology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name behav neurol
Abbreviated Name behavioural neurology
ISSN 1875-8584
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bn
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2012
Action and object word writing in a case of bilingual aphasia.
Kambanaros, Maria;Messinis, Lambros;Anyfantis, Emmanouil;
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 215-22
415 views DOI Abstract
2015
Psychological Benefits of Nonpharmacological Methods Aimed for Improving Balance in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review
Šumec, Rastislav;Filip, Pavel;Sheardová, Kateřina;Bareš, Martin;
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
398 views Abstract
2019
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) among Children Aged 6 to 17 Years Old Living in Girja District, Rural Ethiopia
Lola, Hirbaye Mokona;Belete, Habte;Gebeyehu, Abebaw;Zerihun, Aemro;Yimer, Solomon;Leta, Kassech;Lola, Hirbaye Mokona;Belete, Habte;Gebeyehu, Abebaw;Zerihun, Aemro;Yimer, Solomon;Leta, Kassech;
Vol. 2019
384 views DOI
2019
Cognitive Rehabilitation of Acquired Calculation Disturbances.
Ardila, Alfredo;Rosselli, Monica;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 3151092
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering
Schrader, Harald;Bøhmer, Thomas;Aasly, Jan;Schrader, Harald;Bøhmer, Thomas;Aasly, Jan;
Vol. 2019
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Behavioral and Cognitive Impacts of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review
Poissant, Hélène;Mendrek, Adrianna;Talbot, Nadine;Khoury, Bassam;Nolan, Jennifer;Poissant, Hélène;Mendrek, Adrianna;Talbot, Nadine;Khoury, Bassam;Nolan, Jennifer;
Vol. 2019
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Addressing Evidence Linking Secondary Alexithymia to Aberrant Humor Processing.
Patrikelis, Panayiotis;Lucci, Giuliana;Alexoudi, Athanasia;Korfias, Stefanos;Messinis, Lambros;Nasios, Grigorios;Papasilekas, Themistoklis;Sakas, Damianos;Gatzonis, Stylianos;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 1803624
310 views DOI Abstract
2018
der blick als literarischer ausdruck der wiener moderne. hugo von hofmannsthals klytämnestra<br><i>[the gaze as literary expression in viennese modernism. hugo von hofmannsthal’s clytemnestra]</i>
;Panagiota Varvitsioti
Vol. 26 , pp. 99-126
281 views DOI Abstract
2014
studia austriaca xxii (2014)
;Fausto Cercignani
Vol. 22 , pp. 1-192
266 views DOI Abstract
2012
eva rossmann’s mystery novel «russen kommen». the russians are coming. new crimes, old fears, and intercultural alliances
;Heike Henderson
Vol. 20 , pp. 25-32
265 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.