Indexed in Journament

kennedy institute of ethics journal

ISSN 1086-3249· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.5/100
Journament Score
#9,069
Journament Rank
39
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name kennedy inst ethics j
Abbreviated Name kennedy inst ethics j
ISSN 1086-3249
URL http://kiej.georgetown.edu

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim ahci soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2020
When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong?
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 71-109
410 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethical Concerns with Applied Behavior Analysis for Autism Spectrum "Disorder".
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 31-69
374 views DOI Abstract
Choosing Disability, Visualizing Care.
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 301-321
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Face Transplantation and Identity: Hidden Identities, Exceptions, and Exclusions.
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 125-158
340 views DOI Abstract
2020
Contextual Injustice.
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 1-30
322 views DOI Abstract
2014
fungsi sertifikat jaminan fidusia menurut uu no. 42 tahun 1999 jaminan fidusia
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
321 views Abstract
2014
politik hukum pemerintahan desa di indonesia
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. -
296 views Abstract
2014
2015
perspektif law as an allocative system undang-undang otoritas jasa keuangan
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. -
278 views Abstract
2020
Contextual Injustice.
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 1-30
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethical Concerns with Applied Behavior Analysis for Autism Spectrum "Disorder".
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 31-69
374 views DOI Abstract
2020
When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong?
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 71-109
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Face Transplantation and Identity: Hidden Identities, Exceptions, and Exclusions.
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 125-158
340 views DOI Abstract
2018
legal protection for consumer of unlicenced vapor from drug and food supervisory agency
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. -
196 views DOI Abstract
2017
inovasi kualitas pelayanan publik pemerintah daerah
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. -
139 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.