Indexed in Journament

kennedy institute of ethics journal

ISSN 1086-3249· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
20.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #29,009 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 1.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name kennedy inst ethics j
Abbreviated Name kennedy inst ethics j
ISSN 1086-3249
URL http://kiej.georgetown.edu

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 0.0 28.8
Innovation 18.0 31.2
Community Impact 8.6 13.4
Content Distribution 57.9 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2020
When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong?
Gomez, Javiera Perez;
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 71-109
421 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethical Concerns with Applied Behavior Analysis for Autism Spectrum "Disorder".
Wilkenfeld, Daniel A;McCarthy, Allison M;
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 31-69
400 views DOI Abstract
Choosing Disability, Visualizing Care.
Adams, Rachel;
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 301-321
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Contextual Injustice.
Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins;
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 1-30
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Face Transplantation and Identity: Hidden Identities, Exceptions, and Exclusions.
Lee, Joseph;
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 125-158
349 views DOI Abstract
2014
fungsi sertifikat jaminan fidusia menurut uu no. 42 tahun 1999 jaminan fidusia
;Aprilianti Aprilianti
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
333 views Abstract
2014
permasalahan pelaksanaan lelang eksekusi putusan pengadilan dalam perkara perdata dalam praktik
;Depri Liber Sonata
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
308 views Abstract
2014
politik hukum pemerintahan desa di indonesia
;Muhammad Iwan Satriawan
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. -
305 views Abstract
2017
pencegahan kecurangan (fraud) dalam pelaksanaan program jaminan kesehatan pada sistem jaminan sosial kesehatan (sjsn) (studi di rumah sakit umum daerah menggala tulang bawang)
;Tatik Sri Hartati
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. -
294 views DOI Abstract
2015
perspektif law as an allocative system undang-undang otoritas jasa keuangan
;agus darmawan
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. -
286 views Abstract
2020
Contextual Injustice.
Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins;
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 1-30
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethical Concerns with Applied Behavior Analysis for Autism Spectrum "Disorder".
Wilkenfeld, Daniel A;McCarthy, Allison M;
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 31-69
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong?
Gomez, Javiera Perez;
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 71-109
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
Face Transplantation and Identity: Hidden Identities, Exceptions, and Exclusions.
Lee, Joseph;
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 125-158
349 views DOI Abstract
2018
reformulation of the government compilation of islamic law: strengthening the concept of gender sensitive regulations in indonesia
;Fauna Alwy
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. -
181 views DOI Abstract
2018
legal protection for consumer of unlicenced vapor from drug and food supervisory agency
;Dedhi Bima Samudra;Noor Fatimah Mediawati;M Tanzil Multazam;Emy Rosna Wati
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. -
203 views DOI Abstract
2017
penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana penyalahgunaan izin tinggal keimigrasian (studi kantor imigrasi kelas i bandar lampung)
;Albert Sanusi
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. -
158 views DOI Abstract
2017
penyelesaian perkara pidana anak secara adat lampung megow pak tulang bawang dalam rangka restorative justice
;Hendri Pratama
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. -
125 views DOI Abstract
2017
tpp (trans-pacific partnership) and digital copyright infringement (conflict interest between japan, usa and indonesia)
;Bayu Sujadmiko
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
164 views DOI Abstract
2017
inovasi kualitas pelayanan publik pemerintah daerah
;Robi Cahyadi Kurniawan
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. -
150 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
20.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #29,009 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

20.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

18.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

57.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.