advances in mathematical physics | Journament
This journal has not been published yet.

Journal Ranking

#4101 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

advances in mathematical physics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name advances in mathematical physics
Abbreviated Name advances in mathematical physics
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (51 total)

2007
scomposizione della dispersione per variabili statistiche ordinali
;Leonardo Grilli;Carla Rampichini
Vol. 62 , No. 1 , pp. 111-116
245 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nonlocal Telegraph Equation in Frame of the Conformable Time-Fractional Derivative
Bouaouid, Mohamed;Hilal, Khalid;Melliani, Said;Bouaouid, Mohamed;Hilal, Khalid;Melliani, Said;
Vol. 2019
225 views DOI Abstract
2007
displaced calibration of pm10 measurements using spatio-temporal models
;Daniela Cocchi;Fedele Greco;Carlo Trivisano
Vol. 66 , No. 2 , pp. 127-138
225 views DOI Abstract
2007
estimating fisher information in normal population with prior information
;Housila P. Singh;Sharad Saxena
Vol. 65 , No. 1 , pp. 73-91
209 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dynamic Study of a Predator-Prey Model with Weak Allee Effect and Delay
Ye, Yong;Liu, Hua;Wei, Yu-mei;Ma, Ming;Zhang, Kai;Ye, Yong;Liu, Hua;Wei, Yu-mei;Ma, Ming;Zhang, Kai;
Vol. 2019
202 views DOI Abstract
2007
spatial dependence and non-linearities in regional growth behaviour in italy
;Giuseppe Arbia;Roberto Basile
Vol. 65 , No. 2 , pp. 145-167
185 views DOI Abstract
2007
an empirical study on new product development process by nonparametric combination (npc) testing methodology and post- stratification
;Livio Corain;Luigi Salmaso
Vol. 63 , No. 2 , pp. 335-357
184 views DOI Abstract
2015
empirical bayes conditional density estimation
;Catia Scricciolo
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 37-55
181 views DOI Abstract
2007
simultaneous transformation into interval scales for a set of categorical variables
;Angelo Zanella;Gabriele Cantaluppi
Vol. 64 , No. 2 , pp. 401-426
172 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bright Soliton Solution of (1
Zhao, Yukun;Chen, Yujie;Dai, Jun;Wang, Ying;Wang, Wei;Zhao, Yukun;Chen, Yujie;Dai, Jun;Wang, Ying;Wang, Wei;
Vol. 2019
171 views DOI Abstract
View All 51 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.