advances in civil engineering | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1412 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

advances in civil engineering

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name advances in civil engineering
Abbreviated Name advances in civil engineering
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (51 total)

2011
nailfold capillaroscopy and blood flow laser-doppler analysis of the microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis: preliminary results
;C. Pizzorni;A. Sulli;M.E. Secchi;M. Cutolo
Vol. 61 , No. 1 , pp. 34-40
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
Methodology for Building Information Modeling (BIM) Implementation in Structural Engineering Companies (SECs)
Muñoz-La Rivera, Felipe;Vielma, Juan Carlos;Herrera, Rodrigo F.;Carvallo, Jorge;Muñoz-La Rivera, Felipe;Vielma, Juan Carlos;Herrera, Rodrigo F.;Carvallo, Jorge;
Vol. 2019
359 views DOI Abstract
2011
Cementitious Spray Dryer Ash-Tire Fiber Material for Maximizing Waste Diversion
Riley, Charles E.;Atadero, Rebecca A.;Lindt, John W. van de;Heyliger, Paul R.;
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
338 views Abstract
2016
idiopathic granulomatous mastitis with erythema nodosum and polyarthritis
;J. Alungal;M.C. Abdulla;R. Narayan
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. 97-99
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Simplified Method for Calculating the Active Earth Pressure on Retaining Walls of Narrow Backfill Width Based on DEM Analysis
Yang, Minghui;Deng, Bo;Yang, Minghui;Deng, Bo;
Vol. 2019
321 views DOI Abstract
2018
Investigation of the Effect of Recycled Asphalt Pavement Material on Permeability and Bearing Capacity in the Base Layer
Seferoğlu, Ayşegül Güneş;Seferoğlu, Mehmet Tevfik;Akpınar, Muhammet Vefa;
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
311 views Abstract
2018
Study on the Spatially Variable Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Deformation Behavior of Accumulation Reservoir Landslide Based on Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Survey
Zhang, Shu;Xiahou, Yunshan;Tang, Huiming;Huang, Lei;Liu, Xiao;Wu, Qiong;
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
304 views Abstract
2018
Strengthening of Precast RC Frame to Mitigate Progressive Collapse by Externally Bonded CFRP Sheets Anchored with HFRP Anchors
Pan, Jianwu;Wang, Xian;Wu, Fang;
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
294 views Abstract
2017
carpal tunnel syndrome in hiv-positive patients coinfected with hcv
;A. Mastroianni;F. Allegrini;S. Nardi;D. Donatucci;F. Girelli;C. Guidi
Vol. 69 , No. 4 , pp. 164-169
288 views DOI Abstract
2011
the evaluation of the fibromyalgia patients
;A. Alciati;G. Arioli;L. Altomonte;R. Casale;S. Stisi;G. Cassisi;G. Biasi;M. Di Franco;M. Spath;D. Buskila;M. Cazzola;F. Ceccherelli;A. Marsico;R. Gorla;R. Torta;R. Carignola;R.H. Gracely;L. Bazzichi;F. Salaffi;F. Atzeni;G. Leardini;F. Marinangeli;M.A. Giamberardino;P. Sarzi-Puttini
Vol. 60 , No. 1s , pp. 36-49
281 views DOI Abstract
View All 51 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.