Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#449 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 16 hours ago

Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs
Abbreviated Name asia pac j oncol nurs
ISSN 2347-5625
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (50 total)

2015
Living in limbo: Being diagnosed with oral tongue cancer
Philiponis, Genevieve;Malloy, Kelly M;Kagan, Sarah H;
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 242-249
564 views Abstract
2011
the effect of a restraint reduction program on physical restraint rates in rehabilitation settings in hong kong
;Claudia K. Y. Lai;Susan K. Y. Chow;Lorna K. P. Suen;Ivan Y. C. Wong
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
476 views DOI Abstract
Risk Factors of Cervical Cancer: A Case-Control Study.
Kashyap, Nainakshi;Krishnan, Nadiya;Kaur, Sukhpal;Ghai, Sandhya;
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 308-314
418 views DOI Abstract
2015
Familiarity, opinions, experiences and knowledge about scalp cooling: a Dutch survey among breast cancer patients and oncological professionals
Peerbooms, Mijke;Hurk, Corina JG van den;Breed, Wim PM;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 35-41
367 views Abstract
A Mixed-Method Study Examining Cancer Screening Uptake among South Asian Ethnic Minorities in Hong Kong.
So, Winnie K W;Law, Bernard M H;Choi, Kai Chow;Chan, Dorothy N S;Chan, Carmen W H;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 12-17
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Health Belief Model-Based Education on Health Beliefs and Breast Self-Examination in Nursing Students
Kissal, A.
Vol. 6 , pp. 403-410
335 views DOI
2010
no difference in transverse abdominis activation ratio between healthy and asymptomatic low back pain patients during therapeutic exercise
;Nathaniel Gorbet;Noelle M. Selkow;Joseph M. Hart;Susan Saliba
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
280 views DOI Abstract
2018
Hopelessness, Perceived Social Support and their Relationship in Iranian Patients with Cancer
Madani, H.
Vol. 5 , pp. 314-319
277 views DOI
2018
the relationship between physical fitness and simulated firefighting task performance
;Goris Nazari;Joy C. MacDermid;Kathryn E. Sinden;Tom J. Overend
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
277 views DOI Abstract
2017
Hepatocellular carcinoma: Implications for Asia-Pacific Oncology Nurses
Boyle, Deborah A;
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 98-103
276 views Abstract
View All 50 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.