Vascular health and risk management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#294 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Vascular health and risk management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Vasc Health Risk Manag
Abbreviated Name vascular health and risk management
ISSN 1178-2048
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.dovepress.com/vascular-health-and-risk-management-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (36 total)

2006
Vascular risks and management of obesity in children and adolescents
Jolliffe, Courtney J;Janssen, Ian;
Vol. Volume 2 , pp. 171-187
367 views Abstract
2011
Critical review of cancer risk associated with angiotensin receptor blocker therapy
Grégoire Wuerzner;Michel Burnier;Bernard Waeber;
Vol. 7 , pp. 741--747
305 views DOI Abstract
2011
Critical review of cancer risk associated with angiotensin receptor blocker therapy
Grégoire Wuerzner;Michel Burnier;Bernard Waeber and
Vol. 7 , pp. 741-747
289 views DOI Abstract
2017
cytogenetic data on the agro-predatory ant megalomyrmex incisus smith, 1947 and its host, mycetophylax conformis (mayr, 1884) (hymenoptera, formicidae)
;Danon Clemes Cardoso;Tassia Tatiane Pereira Pontes;Alessandro Lick Cordeiro;Maykon Passos Cristiano
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 45-53
283 views DOI Abstract
2010
Blood pressure-independent effect of candesartan on cardio-ankle vascular index in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome
Bokuda, Kanako;Ichihara, Atsuhiro;Sakoda, Mariyo;al, et;
Vol. 2010 , No. default , pp. 571-578
262 views Abstract
2015
comparative study of mitotic chromosomes in two blowflies, lucilia sericata and l. cluvia (diptera, calliphoridae), by c- and g-like banding patterns and rrna loci, and implications for karyotype evolution
;Mónica G. Chirino;Luis F. Rossi;María J. Bressa;Juan P. Luaces;María Susana Merani
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 103-118
261 views DOI Abstract
2012
identifying parental chromosomes and genomic rearrangements in animal hybrid complexes of species with small genome size using genomic in situ hybridization (gish)
;Massimiliano Rampin;Ke Bi;James Bogart;Maria Joao Collares Pereira
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 287-300
259 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative analysis of chromosomes in the palaearctic bush-crickets of tribe pholidopterini (orthoptera, tettigoniinae)
;Elżbieta Warchałowska-Śliwa;Beata Grzywacz;Klaus-Gerhard Heller;Dragan P. Chobanov
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 309-324
254 views DOI Abstract
2008
Update on the use of Trandolapril in the management of cardiovascular disorders
Diaz, Ariel;Ducharme, Anique;
Vol. Volume 4 , pp. 1147-1158
247 views Abstract
2012
karyotype analysis of panax ginseng c.a.meyer, 1843 (araliaceae) based on rdna loci and dapi band distribution
;Nomar Waminal;Hye Mi Park;Kwang Bok Ryu;Joo Hyung Kim;Tae Jin Yang;Hyun Hee Kim
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 425-441
242 views DOI Abstract
View All 36 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.