Psychology research and behavior management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#954 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 9 hours ago

Psychology research and behavior management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim soc
Short Name Psychol Res Behav Manag
Abbreviated Name psychology research and behavior management
ISSN 1179-1578
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.dovepress.com/psychology-research-and-behavior-management-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (93 total)

2019
The relationship between procrastination, perceived stress, saliva alpha-amylase level and parenting styles in Chinese first year medical students
A, Khalid;Q, Zhang;W, Wang;AS, Ghaffari;F, Pan;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 489-498
433 views Abstract
2018
Cultivating employees’ communal relationship and organizational citizenship behavior through authentic leadership: studying the influence of procedural justice
S, Iqbal;T, Farid;J, Ma;Q, Mehmood;
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 545-555
427 views Abstract
2019
Mitigating effect of perceived organizational support on stress in the presence of workplace ostracism in the Pakistani nursing sector.
Sarfraz, Muddassar;Qun, Wang;Sarwar, Ambreen;Abdullah, Muhammad Ibrahim;Imran, Muhammad Kashif;Shafique, Imran;
Vol. 12 , pp. 839-849
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
An empirical investigation on the relationship between a high-performance work system and employee performance: measuring a mediation model through partial least squares-structural equation modeling.
Li, Cai;Naz, Shumaila;Khan, Muhammad Aamir Shafique;Kusi, Basil;Murad, Majid;
Vol. 12 , pp. 397-416
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Composition of motivation profiles at work using latent analysis: theory and evidence.
Chen, Chun-Xiao;Zhang, Jian;Gilal, Faheem Gul;
Vol. 12 , pp. 811-824
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
A latent profile approach for the study of internet gaming disorder, social media addiction, and psychopathology in a normative sample of adolescents.
Cerniglia, Luca;Griffiths, Mark D;Cimino, Silvia;De Palo, Valeria;Monacis, Lucia;Sinatra, Maria;Tambelli, Renata;
Vol. 12 , pp. 651-659
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
The relationship between procrastination, perceived stress, saliva alpha-amylase level and parenting styles in Chinese first year medical students.
Khalid, Arslan;Zhang, Qian;Wang, Wei;Ghaffari, Abdul Sattar;Pan, Fang;
Vol. 12 , pp. 489-498
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Facing exclusion and smiling through the pain: positive emotion expression during interpersonal ostracism.
Svetieva, Elena;Zadro, Lisa;Kim, Daejoong;Hurley, Carolyn M;Goodacre, Rani;
Vol. 12 , pp. 229-239
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of an instrument based on the theory of planned behavior variables to measure factors influencing Iranian adults' intention to quit waterpipe tobacco smoking.
Mirzaei, Nasim;Dehdari, Tahereh;Taghdisi, Mohammad Hossein;Zare, Najaf;
Vol. 12 , pp. 901-912
344 views DOI Abstract
2018
Spotlight on math anxiety.
Luttenberger, Silke;Wimmer, Sigrid;Paechter, Manuela;
Vol. 11 , pp. 311-322
312 views DOI Abstract
View All 93 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.