Indexed in Journament

psoriasis: targets and therapy

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,143 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 7.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name psoriasis: targets and therapy
Abbreviated Name psoriasis: targets and therapy
URL https://www.dovepress.com/psoriasis-targets-and-therapy-journal

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for psoriasis: targets and therapy
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 11.1 24.4
Innovation 4.5 25.7
Community Impact 2.9 5.8
Content Distribution 79.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2017
conservation genetics of american crocodile, crocodylus acutus, populations in pacific costa rica
Vol. 17 , pp. 1-17
329 views DOI Abstract
2018
proposed biodiversity conservation areas: gap analysis and spatial prioritization on the inadequately studied qinghai plateau, china
Vol. 24 , pp. 1-20
299 views DOI Abstract
2016
does timing of breeding matter less where the grass is greener? seasonal declines in breeding performance differ between regions in an endangered endemic raptor
Vol. 15 , pp. 23-45
299 views DOI Abstract
2016
Psoriasis and smoking: links and risks
Vol. 6 , pp. 65-71
299 views DOI Abstract
2016
Combining biologic and phototherapy treatments for psoriasis: safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability
Vol. 6 , pp. 105-111
297 views DOI Abstract
2017
the great capricorn beetle cerambyx cerdo l. in south-western poland – the current state and perspectives of conservation in one of the recent distribution centres in central europe
Vol. 19 , pp. 111-134
281 views DOI Abstract
2016
Combining biologic and phototherapy treatments for psoriasis: safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability
Vol. 6 , pp. 105--111
280 views DOI Abstract
2014
towards a different attitude to uncertainty
Vol. 8 , pp. 95-114
277 views DOI Abstract
2016
Psoriasis and smoking: links and risks
Vol. 6 , pp. 65--71
275 views DOI Abstract
2018
proposed biodiversity conservation areas: gap analysis and spatial prioritization on the inadequately studied qinghai plateau, china
Vol. 24 , pp. 1-20
299 views DOI Abstract
2017
applying surrogate species presences to correct sample bias in species distribution models: a case study using the pilbara population of the northern quoll
Vol. 18 , pp. 25-46
215 views DOI Abstract
2017
roads may act as barriers to flying insects: species composition of bees and wasps differs on two sides of a large highway
Vol. 18 , pp. 47-59
269 views DOI Abstract
2017
attraction of different types of wood for adults of morimus asper (coleoptera, cerambycidae)
Vol. 19 , pp. 135-148
124 views DOI Abstract
2017
the influence of motivational factors on the frequency of participation in citizen science activities
Vol. 18 , pp. 61-78
169 views DOI Abstract
2017
conservation genetics of american crocodile, crocodylus acutus, populations in pacific costa rica
Vol. 17 , pp. 1-17
329 views DOI Abstract
2017
the great capricorn beetle cerambyx cerdo l. in south-western poland – the current state and perspectives of conservation in one of the recent distribution centres in central europe
Vol. 19 , pp. 111-134
281 views DOI Abstract
2016
does timing of breeding matter less where the grass is greener? seasonal declines in breeding performance differ between regions in an endangered endemic raptor
Vol. 15 , pp. 23-45
299 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
24.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,143 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

24.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

4.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.