Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment | Journament

Journal Ranking

#132 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
44.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
Abbreviated Name neuropsychiatric disease and treatment
ISSN 1176-6328
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.dovepress.com/neuropsychiatric-disease-and-treatment-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2013
Maturation of the adolescent brain
M, Arain;M, Haque;L, Johal;P, Mathur;W, Nel;A, Rais;R, Sandhu;S, Sharma;
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 449-461
454 views Abstract
2018
Comparative efficacy and safety of L. for treating mild to moderate major depressive disorder in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Yang, Xiangying;Chen, Xiaolu;Fu, Yixiao;Luo, Qinghua;Du, Lian;Qiu, Haitang;Qiu, Tian;Zhang, Li;Meng, Huaqing;
Vol. 14 , pp. 1297-1305
411 views DOI Abstract
2018
Comparative efficacy and safety of Crocus sativus L. for treating mild to moderate major depressive disorder in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
XY, Yang;XL, Chen;YX, Fu;QH, Luo;L, Du;HT, Qiu;T, Qiu;L, Zhang;HQ, Meng;
Vol. Volume 14 , pp. 1297-1305
386 views Abstract
2019
Comparison of serum B12, folate and homocysteine concentrations in children with autism spectrum disorder or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls.
Yektaş, Çiğdem;Alpay, Merve;Tufan, Ali Evren;
Vol. 15 , pp. 2213-2219
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Difficulties In Emotion Regulation During Rehabilitation For Alcohol Addiction: Correlations With Metacognitive Beliefs About Alcohol Use And Relapse Risk.
Ottonello, M;Fiabane, E;Pistarini, C;Spigno, P;Torselli, E;
Vol. 15 , pp. 2917-2925
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in defining functional recovery in bipolar I disorder. Post-hoc analyses of long-term studies of aripiprazole once monthly as maintenance treatment
Jessica Madera;Pedro Such;Peter Zhang;Ross A Baker;Iria Grande and
Vol. 15 , pp. 2325-2338
356 views DOI Abstract
2018
Automatic epilepsy detection using fractal dimensions segmentation and GP-SVM classification.
Jirka, Jakub;Prauzek, Michal;Krejcar, Ondrej;Kuca, Kamil;
Vol. 14 , pp. 2439-2449
354 views DOI Abstract
2017
Biochemical assessments of thyroid profile, serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol and cluster of differentiation 5 expression levels among children with autism
T, Desoky;MH, Hassan;HM, Fayed;HM, Sakhr;
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 2397-2403
353 views Abstract
2019
Brivaracetam in the treatment of epilepsy: a review of clinical trial data.
Feyissa, Anteneh M;
Vol. 15 , pp. 2587-2600
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychological status of nursing survivors in China and its associated factors: 6 years after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake.
Liao, Jingping;Ma, Xiaofang;Gao, Bin;Zhang, Mingfeng;Zhang, Yuanfang;Liu, Maoqun;Li, Xiaolin;
Vol. 15 , pp. 2301-2311
336 views DOI Abstract
View All 31 Articles
44
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

44.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.