Indexed in Journament

integrated blood pressure control

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #8,249 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
220 Articles
Scores higher than 71.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name integrated blood pressure control
Abbreviated Name integrated blood pressure control
URL https://www.dovepress.com/integrated-blood-pressure-control-journal

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for integrated blood pressure control
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 64.6 28.8
Innovation 69.0 31.2
Community Impact 7.9 13.4
Content Distribution 76.5 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (220)

2016
Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure in lowering blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a critical review of the literature
Vol. 9 , pp. 43-47
519 views DOI Abstract
2017
Medication adherence and its associated factors among hypertensive patients attending the Debre Tabor General Hospital, northwest Ethiopia
Vol. 10 , pp. 1-7
495 views DOI Abstract
2017
Serum magnesium and calcium in preeclampsia: a comparative study at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana
Vol. 10 , pp. 9-15
439 views DOI Abstract
2017
Effects of voluntary exercise on blood pressure, angiotensin II, aldosterone, and renal function in two-kidney, one-clip hypertensive rats
Vol. 10 , pp. 41-51
439 views DOI Abstract
2016
Lercanidipine/enalapril combination in the management of obesity-related hypertension
Vol. 9 , pp. 69-77
434 views DOI Abstract
2013
Long-acting nifedipine for hypertensive patients in the Middle East and Morocco: observations on efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy or combination therapy
Vol. 6 , pp. 49-57
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Current insights of inspiratory muscle training on the cardiovascular system: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Vol. 12 , pp. 1--11
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Current insights of inspiratory muscle training on the cardiovascular system: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Vol. 12 , pp. 1-11
314 views DOI Abstract
2018
Masked hypertension and cardiovascular outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Vol. 11 , pp. 11--24
291 views DOI Abstract
2018
Morning blood pressure surge: pathophysiology, clinical relevance and therapeutic aspects
Vol. 11 , pp. 47--56
274 views DOI Abstract
2018
The effect of passive leg-raising maneuver on hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction for adult cardiac surgery
Vol. 11 , pp. 57--63
310 views DOI Abstract
2018
Exercise as a tool for hypertension and resistant hypertension management: current insights
Vol. 11 , pp. 65--71
175 views DOI Abstract
2018
White coat syndrome and its variations: differences and clinical impact
Vol. 11 , pp. 73--79
223 views DOI Abstract
2018
Hypertension and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: parallel or series?
Vol. 11 , pp. 81--91
271 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #8,249 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

64.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

69.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.